Citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd) populations are composed of closely related haplotypes whose frequencies in the population result from the equilibrium between mutation, selection and genetic drift. The genetic diversity of CEVd populations infecting different citrus hosts was studied by comparing populations recovered from infected trifoliate orange and sour orange seedling trees after 10 years of evolution, with the ancestral population maintained for the same period in the original host, Etrog citron. Furthermore, populations isolated from these trifoliate orange and sour orange trees were transmitted back to Etrog citron plants and the evolution of their mutant spectra was studied. The results indicate that (i) the amount and composition of the within-plant genetic diversity generated varies between these two hosts and is markedly different from that which is characteristic of the original Etrog citron host and (ii) the genetic diversity found after transmitting back to Etrog citron is indistinguishable from that which is characteristic of the ancestral Etrog citron population, regardless of the citrus plant from which the evolved populations were isolated. The relationship between the CEVd populations from Etrog citron and trifoliate orange, both sensitive hosts, and those from sour orange, which is a tolerant host, is discussed.
INTRODUCTIONViroids are small plant pathogens consisting of a naked single-stranded circular RNA molecule of 246-475 nt, that do not encode any proteins but are endowed with autonomous replication in their host plants. It is very likely that viroids have been co-evolving with their hosts since their origin, although many of them show a wide host range. The identification of viroids in wild and cultivated plants, as symptomless carriers, suggests that certain hosts may act as natural viroid reservoirs (Diener, 1995).Viroids are taxonomically classified into two families, Pospiviroidae and Avsunviroidae (Elena et al., 1991). These families mainly differ in three characteristics. First, all pospiviroidae present a central conserved region (CCR) in their rod-like secondary structure, whereas the avsunviroidae lack such a region. Second, the pospiviroidae rely on cellular factors to process their multimeric replication intermediates into unit-length molecules, while the avsunviroidae present hammerhead ribozyme structures that are able to self-cleave the multimeric forms. Third, the pospiviroidae replicate in the nucleus whereas the avsunviroidae replicate in the chloroplast (reviewed by Flores et al., 2005).Like most RNA and some DNA viruses, viroids replicate within their hosts as polymorphic populations composed of closely related sequence variants generally distributed around a predominant one. This polymorphic population structure arises as a result of (i) the high mutation rates inherent to the cellular DNA-dependent RNA polymerases involved in viroid replication subverted to replicate an RNA template and (ii) the diverse and fluctuating selective pressures imposed by the different ...