Movement quality evaluation and its correlation with recommended functional measures in hip osteoarthritis

Olsen, Aarid Liland; Magnussen, Liv Heide; Skjærven, Liv Karin Helvik; Aßmus, Jörg; Sundal, Mary Anne; Ostelo, Raymond; Strand, Liv Inger

doi:10.1002/pri.1848

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As hypothesized, the intervention participants in our study were inclined to report more improvement on pain and function on PGIC, but this was not reflected in improvement by NRS and HOOS A scores. In a study of correlations between baseline scores in our study sample, we found only weak associations between movement quality (BARS-MQE) and NRS and HOOS A (Olsen et al, 2020), which indicates that other primary outcomes might have been more suitable to capture changes related to improved movement quality from BBAT.…”

Section: Notementioning

confidence: 61%

Basic Body Awareness Therapy versus standard care in hip osteoarthritis. A randomized controlled trial

Olsen

Magnussen

Skjærven

et al. 2021

Physiotherapy Res Intl

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Compensational movement patterns in hip osteoarthritis (HOA) are associated with hip dysfunction. Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) promotes functional movement quality and might, accordingly, be beneficial in HOA.Objective: To examine the outcomes of BBAT compared to standard care in people with HOA after first receiving patient education (PE). StudyDesign: A prospective, assessor-blinded, and block-randomized controlled trial. Methods: Community-living adults with HOA participating in PE were randomly allocated to an intervention group receiving BBAT in groups (12 sessions offered once a week), or a comparison group. Data at baseline (pretest) and at 6 months (posttest) were analyzed. Primary outcomes were pain during walking assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and function by the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, subscale ADL (HOOS A). Secondary outcomes addressed physical capacity, movement quality, and self-reported aspects of function and health. Results: At pretest, there were no significant differences in demographic and test data between the intervention (n = 51) and the comparison (n = 50) group. Fortyone intervention and 45 comparison participants completed the posttest. At posttest, no significant differences in change between groups were found on NRS (p = 0.694, effect size (ES) = 0.02) or HOOS A (p = 0.783, ES = 0.07). Among secondary outcomes, movement quality improved significantly more (p < 0.001, ES = 0.84) in the intervention group. Compliance with BBAT varied substantially. Per-protocol analysis showed changes in favor of the intervention group for selfefficacy (p = 0.049, ES = 0.36), health (p = 0.037, ES = 0.44), and function (p = 0.029, ES = 0.53) when only intervention participants who completed at least 10 sessions of BBAT were included.Conclusions: BBAT was not found to be a more effective treatment modality than self-initiated standard care to reduce pain during walking and improve dailyThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

show abstract

Section: Notementioning

confidence: 61%

Basic Body Awareness Therapy versus standard care in hip osteoarthritis. A randomized controlled trial

Olsen

Magnussen

Skjærven

et al. 2021

Physiotherapy Res Intl

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This lack of consensus about what movement quality entails, hinders the formulation of a practical definition and indicates the necessity for further steps to determine the relevance for physiotherapy practices (van Dijk et al, 2017). Although a movement quality tool such as the Body Awareness Rating Scale- (Skjaerven et al, 2015) shows moderate associations with functional exercise capacity scores, it has either no or weak associations with pain symptom and QoL outcomes in people with long-lasting musculoskeletal disorders (Olsen et al, 2020). Moreover, despite the recognition by physiotherapists applying the BBAT methodology of the central role of movement quality in physiotherapy programs for patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal disorders, chronic pain and mental health conditions (Ahola et al, 2021;Albertsen et al, 2019;Kaarbø et al, 2018;Mitsue & Yamamoto, 2019;Skjaerven et al, 2020), there is a lack of unambiguous descriptions of movement quality and of instruments to measure it (van Dijk et al, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of basic body awareness therapy on functional outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Vancampfort

Brunner

Damme

et al. 2022

Physiotherapy Res Intl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This study examined the efficacy of basis body awareness therapy (BBAT) on functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with mental health problems and long-lasting conditions including musculoskeletal disorders, chronic and psychosomatic pain, and neurological conditions. Material and Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and PEDro from inception to April 1st, 2022. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to explore the efficacy of BBAT versus non-active and active control conditions. Results: Eight RCTs (n BBAT = 307, n controls = 428) were included. There was no evidence for reductions in anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −3.30 to 0.46, p = 0.14), depression (SMD = −0.82, 95% CI = −1.85 to 0.21, p = 0.12), and no improvements in global assessment of functioning for functioning (GAF-F) (SMD = 0.58, 95% CI = −0.03 to 1.19, p = 0.06)or for symptoms (GAF-S) (SMD = 0.76, 95% CI = −0.44 to 1.96, p = 0.21) in BBAT versus non-active control conditions. BBAT reduced anxiety significantly more than active interventions (SMD = −0.84, 95% CI = −1.17 to −0.51, p < 0.001). No significant differences between BBAT and active control conditions were found for reduction in depression (SMD = −1.16, 95% CI = −2.74 to 0.41, p = 0.15) or in selfreported pain (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI = −0.25 to 0.40, p = 0.65). Active control conditions were superior in improving QoL (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.17, p < 0.001), GAF-F (SMD = 1.58, 95% CI = 0.29 to 2.86, p = 0.016) and GAF-S (SMD = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.53, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Physiotherapists should be cautious in adopting BBAT, noting there is no high-quality evidence to support its' use to improve functionality and QoL in patients with mental health problems and/or long-lasting conditions.

show abstract

“…Most studies on body awareness are focused primarily on adults and people with acute or chronic medical conditions, but it is worth mentioning that body awareness based interventions have positive effects on movement quality, static and dynamic balance, and self-perception (Olsen et al, 2020;Bravo et al, 2019). Body awareness focused exercises improve postural control by enhancing proprioreception (especially in the knee and ankle joints), reorganizing muscular tension, improving muscle recruitment and co-contraction (Yagci et al, 2018;Xing et al, 2023;Fogaça et al, 2021).…”

Section: Self-esteem and Body Awareness Among Children Practicing Karatementioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Sensomotor Communication System Based Exercises on Static Balance and Self-esteem in 7-12 Years Old Karate Pupils

Ivaščenko,

Ivaščenko

2023

Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Karate is a martial art that require a high level of motor and functional abilities, discipline and mental concentration as well. Practicing Kata improves self-awareness and focus, but is not always included in a class agenda. The author’s of sensomotor communication system based exercises have combined principles of movement from martial arts for body awareness. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 12 weeks intervention program of sensomotor communication system based exercises on static balance and self-esteem in karate pupils. In the study 24 karate pupils in the age of 7-12 were included. Training years in karate varied from 1 to 4 years of practice. To assess static balance the Flamingo balance test was used, to evaluate self-esteem, a modified Rosenger self-esteem scale was used. The findings of this study showed a positive effect on static balance and a minor positive effect on self-esteem in karate pupils after the intervention. Sensomotor communication system based exercises could be used for balance and self-esteem improvement. Also, being a more understandable and clearer exercise system, the sensomotor communication exercise program could be a Kata alternative for younger children practicing karate.

show abstract

Movement quality evaluation and its correlation with recommended functional measures in hip osteoarthritis

Cited by 5 publications

References 45 publications

Basic Body Awareness Therapy versus standard care in hip osteoarthritis. A randomized controlled trial

Basic Body Awareness Therapy versus standard care in hip osteoarthritis. A randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of basic body awareness therapy on functional outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Effects of Sensomotor Communication System Based Exercises on Static Balance and Self-esteem in 7-12 Years Old Karate Pupils

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About