1996
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement response of Chaoborus to chemicals from a predator and prey

Abstract: -By means of a silhouette videotaping system we studied the frequency of movements of Chaoborus americanus and Chaoborus punctipennis when exposed to water conditioned in different ways. Four treatments were investigated: unconditioned water was used as a control; predator-conditioned water was water in which fish had been held; prey-conditioned water was water in which cladocerans had been grown; and mixed water was a mixture of predator-and prey-conditioned waters. The movement frequency of C. punctipennis s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, it is likely that migrating Chaoborus species will dominate those temporary ponds as a predator. Also, in lakes with few visual predators, Chaoborus species migrate to deeper depths throughout the day but can still exert a substantial predation pressure on zooplankton species at daytime (Berendonk and O'Brien 1996). In these systems zooplankton migration characteristics would conflict in the presence of the two opposite migrating requirements and may be confined to a narrow water layer to minimize predation and avoid damaging UV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In that case, it is likely that migrating Chaoborus species will dominate those temporary ponds as a predator. Also, in lakes with few visual predators, Chaoborus species migrate to deeper depths throughout the day but can still exert a substantial predation pressure on zooplankton species at daytime (Berendonk and O'Brien 1996). In these systems zooplankton migration characteristics would conflict in the presence of the two opposite migrating requirements and may be confined to a narrow water layer to minimize predation and avoid damaging UV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, C. flavicans, a lake-dwelling species, exhibits diel vertical migration in response to the presence of fish (Dawidowicz 1990;Tjossem 1990). In contrast, the larvae of C. americanus, a pond-dwelling species, do not respond to chemicals from fish, whereas the larvae of C. punctipennis, a lake-dwelling species, do (Berendonk and O'Brien 1996). These results suggest that the larvae of lake-dwelling species, such as C. flavicans, have evolved a behavioral adaptation to the presence of fish, whereas the larvae of pond-dwelling species, such as C. crystallinus, have not evolved such an adaptation or have lost the response.…”
Section: Influence Of Fish Kairomones On the Ovipositing Behavior Of mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For the lake-dwelling species of Chaoborus, selection may occur at the larval stage, promoting alternative antipredator behaviors such as vertical migration and reduced movement frequency to avoid fish (Dawidowicz 1990;Berendonk and O'Brien 1996), assuming that fish predation is the ultimate cause for selective ovipositing and vertical migration in Chaoborus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other phantom midge species, such as Chaoborus crystallinus (Degeer), are rarely found in the presence of fish ( Borkent, 1981 ). Chaoborus species inhabiting fishless lakes have not evolved the vertical migratory defensive mechanism in response to fish chemicals and thus cannot coexist with fish ( Berendonk & O ' Brien, 1996 ). Furthermore, females of Chaoborus species found in fishless lakes avoid ovipositing in water that contains fish chemicals ( Berendonk, 1999 ).…”
Section: Quinquefasciatusmentioning
confidence: 99%