Movement Science Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation, 2nd ed

Carter, Marianne

doi:10.1097/00001577-200214040-00012

Cited by 42 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A key component of physical rehabilitation is relearning how to move [1] in order to perform functional tasks. This can be accomplished through the recovery of previously learned movement strategies or the acquisition of new compensatory movement strategies [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Traumatic amputation: Psychosocial adjustment of six Army women to loss of one or more limbs

Cater¹

2012

JRRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Relatively little attention has been given to the use of well-established motor learning strategies to enable individuals with lower limb loss to effectively and safely learn to walk with their prostheses in the home and community. Traditionally, such outcomes have been pursued by focusing on the design and function of a patient's prosthesis, rather than on how he or she should learn to use it. The use of motor learning strategies may enhance physical rehabilitation outcomes among individuals with lower limb loss. This review explores these motor learning strategies and ways in which they can be applied to the physical rehabilitation of individuals with lower limb loss and highlights some of the challenges to their implementation, as well as unanswered research questions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Traumatic amputation: Psychosocial adjustment of six Army women to loss of one or more limbs

Cater¹

2012

JRRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A recent review of the stroke rehabilitation literature revealed [11] randomized controlled trials comparing specialized patient rehabilitation with conventional care in 2813 stroke survivors [75]. Improved functional outcomes and reduced length of hospital stays were reported among patients receiving specialized rehabilitation [17]. Intensive and structured training is one key element of such rehabilitation programs and the improvement in the desired outcomes is likely to depend on two elements: the intensity of the training and the specificity of the task practiced [76].…”

Section: Cimt/mcimt and Cortical Reorganizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Intensive and structured training is one key element of such rehabilitation programs and the improvement in the desired outcomes is likely to depend on two elements: the intensity of the training and the specificity of the task practiced [76]. Motor learning principles, i.e., intense and structured training, have been now included in two of the most used therapeutic approaches in this population, constraint-induced movement therapies (CIMTs) [17] and motor relearning program developed by Taub [77]. CIMTs have been shown to improve arm functionality even in the chronic stage of stroke [18][19][20] by inducing neuronal plasticity [71,78] (Table 3).…”

Section: Cimt/mcimt and Cortical Reorganizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After six months, about two-thirds of patients continue to suffer from arm sensorimotor impairment that impacts the individual's activities of daily living [5]. Motor deficits consist of weakness of specific muscles [6], abnormal muscle tone [7][8][9], abnormal postural adjustments [10], abnormal movement synergies [11], lack of mobility between structures at the shoulder girdle [10] and incorrect timing of components within a movement pattern [12]. As a result of such impairment, patients may progressively avoid using the affected arm in favor of the unaffected arm for successful ADL, resulting in a learned non-use phenomenon [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other theories emphasize suppression of normal movement patterns in order to facilitate mass movement, including the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) technique [16]. Motor learning principles, i.e., intense and structured training using constraint-induced movement therapies (CIMTs) [17] have been shown to improve arm functionality even in the chronic stage of stroke [18][19][20]. Two forms of CIMTs have been proposed including the original Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and more recently the Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Functional Recovery and the Associated Cortical Reorganization Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapies (CIMTs) in Stroke

Ahmad¹

2017

Int J Neurorehabilitation Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapies (CIMTs) including the original Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and the Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) gained considerable popularity as a treatment approach for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with mild-to-moderate stroke. However, a major barrier in rehabilitation generally and in CIMTs specifically; is the limited objectivity of some commonly used outcome measures and lack sensitivity to define "True" recovery vs. compensation. Thereby, they may not sufficiently detect of long term consequences and the associated neurological recovery. An essential approach to overcome such barrier is to better understand functional motor recovery, associated neural changes and how they may relate to recovery of the pre-morbid movement pattern. Such Understanding for these relationships would add more in-depth insights on the functional relevance of plastic brain changes in stroke following CIMTs to optimize the field of neuro-rehabilitation. This review synthesizes findings from studies to on the use of the CIMTs including CIMT and mCIMT as efficient practice in the management of upper limb dysfunction following a stroke. The analysis will include (1) the functional recovery and (2) the cortical reorganization following the use of mCIMT and CIMT on patients in the chronic stage following stroke.

show abstract

Applying principles of motor learning and control to upper extremity rehabilitation

Muratori

Lamberg

Quinn

et al. 2013

Journal of Hand Therapy

208

129

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of the principles of motor control and learning. Different models of motor control from historical to contemporary are presented with emphasis on the systems model. Concepts of motor learning including skill acquisition, measurement of learning, and methods to promote skill acquisition by examining the many facets of practice scheduling and use of feedback are provided. A fictional client case is introduced and threaded throughout the article to facilitate understanding of these concepts and how they can be applied to clinical practice.

show abstract

Movement Science Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation, 2nd ed

Cited by 42 publications

References 0 publications

Traumatic amputation: Psychosocial adjustment of six Army women to loss of one or more limbs

Traumatic amputation: Psychosocial adjustment of six Army women to loss of one or more limbs

The Functional Recovery and the Associated Cortical Reorganization Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapies (CIMTs) in Stroke

Applying principles of motor learning and control to upper extremity rehabilitation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About