Video Mining 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6928-9_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movie Content Analysis, Indexing and Skimming Via Multimodal Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…User studies are employed for evaluating keyframe extraction techniques in [4,6,8,17,21,29]. These studies involve independent users judging the quality of generated video summaries, and are probably the most useful and realistic form of evaluation (especially when keyframes are extracted for user-based interactive tasks such as content browsing and navigation).…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User studies are employed for evaluating keyframe extraction techniques in [4,6,8,17,21,29]. These studies involve independent users judging the quality of generated video summaries, and are probably the most useful and realistic form of evaluation (especially when keyframes are extracted for user-based interactive tasks such as content browsing and navigation).…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the author indicated in the paper, the system typically split the same actor into different sets due to the various appearances of that actor in the movie. In [3], the system exploited the global structural information of a scene. They built "shot sinks" to classify a scene into one of three scenarios, "two speaker dialog", "multi-speaker dialog", and "others".…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%