2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2005.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movie forecast Guru: A Web-based DSS for Hollywood managers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the modeling phase, the best results are given by the NN model and for both metrics, with improvements of: 2.7 pp for SVM, 3.7 pp for DT and 7.9 pp for LR, in terms of AUC; and 1.6 pp for SVM, 2.1 pp for DT and 4.6 pp for LR, in terms of ALIFT. Interestingly, while DT was the worse performing technique in the modeling phase, prediction tests revealed it as the third best model, outperforming LR and justifying the need for technique comparison in every stage of the decision making process [9]. Table 5 Comparison of models for the rolling windows phase (bold denotes best value) When comparing the best proposed model NN in terms of modeling versus rolling windows phases, there is a decrease in performance, with a reduction in AUC from 0.929 to 0.794 and ALIFT from 0.878 to 0.672.…”
Section: Predictive Knowledge and Potential Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly to the modeling phase, the best results are given by the NN model and for both metrics, with improvements of: 2.7 pp for SVM, 3.7 pp for DT and 7.9 pp for LR, in terms of AUC; and 1.6 pp for SVM, 2.1 pp for DT and 4.6 pp for LR, in terms of ALIFT. Interestingly, while DT was the worse performing technique in the modeling phase, prediction tests revealed it as the third best model, outperforming LR and justifying the need for technique comparison in every stage of the decision making process [9]. Table 5 Comparison of models for the rolling windows phase (bold denotes best value) When comparing the best proposed model NN in terms of modeling versus rolling windows phases, there is a decrease in performance, with a reduction in AUC from 0.929 to 0.794 and ALIFT from 0.878 to 0.672.…”
Section: Predictive Knowledge and Potential Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, SVM provided better results in [6] [8], comparable NN and SVM performances were obtained in [5], while DT outperformed NN and SVM in [24]. These differences in performance emphasize the impact of the problem context and provide a strong reason to test several techniques when addressing a problem before choosing one of them [9]. DSS and BI have been applied to banking in numerous domains, such as credit pricing [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delen etc. constructed an estimation model of film box office based on the type of film, star, technical effect, release time and other characteristic parameters to establish a Web decision support system [19]; Ghiassi et al, set up a dynamic artificial neural network prediction model according to the advertising budget, release time and seasonal forecast variables [20]; Zheng Jian put forward a kind of the movie box office forecasting model based on feedback neural network [21], whose output can not only be more reliable to reflect the movie box office income during the on-showing period, but also point out the range of that; Jing Fei et al, used machine learning methods to make statistical analysis by the information of Microblog, proposing a box office estimating method based on Microblog [22]. By these kinds of prediction and analysis methods based on big data, it is uncomplicated for cinema circuits to make more accurate choice of films.…”
Section: Big Data In Film Broadcastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An obvious line of argument points out that a project features elements identified as beneficial in success factor studies. The numerous proposed forecast models (Sawhney & Eliashberg, 1996;Neelamegham & Chintagunta, 1999;Eliashberg et al, 2000;Chang et al, 2005;Hennig-Thurau et al, 2006;Delen et al, 2007) can be used to determine an expected value of audience interest and thus quantify consumption risk. Thus, it can be assumed that crucial success factors such as content attributes, personnel traits and funding also indicate the relevant areas of risk management in the development phase.…”
Section: Controlling Risks In Movie Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%