2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2017.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving bed membrane bioreactors for carbon and nutrient removal: The effect of C/N variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the nitrification (η nit ), denitrification (η denit ) and total nitrogen (η Ntotal ) removal efficiencies were evaluated according to (Mannina et al, 2017c). In order to discriminate between the COD removal due to the biological processes and the physical effect of membrane, the following removal efficiencies were evaluated according to (Mannina et al, 2017c): biological removal efficiency (η BIO ); physical removal efficiency (η PHYS ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the nitrification (η nit ), denitrification (η denit ) and total nitrogen (η Ntotal ) removal efficiencies were evaluated according to (Mannina et al, 2017c). In order to discriminate between the COD removal due to the biological processes and the physical effect of membrane, the following removal efficiencies were evaluated according to (Mannina et al, 2017c): biological removal efficiency (η BIO ); physical removal efficiency (η PHYS ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ammonium chloride has been added only for the UCT-MBR plant during the experimental campaign at C/N equal to 5 mgCOD/mgN (Mannina et al, 2017b). While, the average inlet COD concentration for the IFAS-UCT-MBR was equal to 543 mg L −1 (56% coming from synthetic wastewater) and 864 mg L −1 (73% coming from synthetic wastewater) for the experimental phase at C/N equal to 5 and 10 mgCOD/mgN, respectively (Mannina et al, 2017c). The average inlet total nitrogen (TN) concentration for the IFAS-UCT-MBR was equal to 92 mg L −1 and 80 mg L −1 for the experimental phase at C/N equal to 5 and 10 mgCOD/mgN, respectively (Mannina et al, 2017c).…”
Section: The Pilot Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it has not been completely elucidated the effect that variable salinity conditions can exert on heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass respiratory activities and system performance within MBR and hybrid MBBR‐MBR systems for municipal wastewater treatment. In this regard, a respirometric method has been used to carry out the kinetic modeling for wastewater treatment systems and MBR and hybrid MBBR‐MBR technologies in particular because of its high reproducibility and accuracy …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, a respirometric method has been used to carry out the kinetic modeling for wastewater treatment systems and MBR and hybrid MBBR-MBR technologies in particular because of its high reproducibility and accuracy. [23][24][25][26] Thus, the aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of the hydraulic retention time, the mixed liquor total suspended solids and the variable influent salinity on three biological systems working in parallel treating salinity-amended real wastewater, i.e. an MBR and two hybrid MBBR-MBR configurations, in terms of process performance and microbial kinetics with the peculiarity of carrying out the start-up of them at variable-salinity conditions without a previous acclimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. Safwat, 2018). Several parameters affect the performance of these systems (Bhatia et al, 2017;Lopez-Lopez et al, 2012;Mannina et al, 2018;Ødegaard et al, 2000;Sriwiriyarat et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%