2013
DOI: 10.1111/all.12160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving from peanut extract to peanut components: towards validation of component‐resolved IgE tests

Abstract: Conventional peanut extracts are deficient in significant IgE-binding components. The inclusion of patients for a validation study should be based on serology performed with improved peanut reagents to avoid a bias against these under-represented, potentially important allergens. To judge clinical relevance of an allergen, the reagent used for inclusion of patients needs to be efficient in detecting IgE to this component.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even at the best cutoff value of 0.5 kU/l, whole-peanut sIgE used alone appeared to be of a low diagnostic value, yielding a maximal Youden index below 0.80, with poor specificity and PPV. We conclude that it cannot reasonably be retained as an accurate tool to discriminate peanut allergy from tolerance, consistent with previous reports [12,23,24,25]. At a cutoff of 0.35 kU/l, the Ara h 2 sIgE immunoassay was acceptable, with a Youden index of 0.94 and a PPV of 100%, in line with recent results [17,26,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even at the best cutoff value of 0.5 kU/l, whole-peanut sIgE used alone appeared to be of a low diagnostic value, yielding a maximal Youden index below 0.80, with poor specificity and PPV. We conclude that it cannot reasonably be retained as an accurate tool to discriminate peanut allergy from tolerance, consistent with previous reports [12,23,24,25]. At a cutoff of 0.35 kU/l, the Ara h 2 sIgE immunoassay was acceptable, with a Youden index of 0.94 and a PPV of 100%, in line with recent results [17,26,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Laboratory tests measuring the serum levels of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) directed against whole-peanut protein extracts have been used to evaluate peanut sensitization. However, even when combined with skin tests, these assays are not able to accurately diagnose peanut allergy and evaluate the risk of anaphylaxis because of a lack of sensitivity and specificity [11,12]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of crossreactivity between crude allergen extracts from different fungi [9], apparent sensitization to crude Af extract does not always indicate genuine Af-sensitization. Recently, allergen components purified from their native sources or produced as recombinant proteins have been introduced into the battery of tests available for the diagnosis of allergic diseases [10][11][12][13], generally known as component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) [14][15][16], more recently, molecular-based allergy (MA) diagnostics [17]. Such techniques and diagnostics may solve this problem; however, clinical studies in MA diagnostics for fungal allergy have thus far been limited [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of components, however, should be interpreted with caution, as it is likely that the panel of hazelnut components is still not complete and therefore could affect the results [23], e.g. we did not determine sIgE to oleosins [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%