2018
DOI: 10.1126/science.aam9712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements

Abstract: Restrictions on roaming Until the past century or so, the movement of wild animals was relatively unrestricted, and their travels contributed substantially to ecological processes. As humans have increasingly altered natural habitats, natural animal movements have been restricted. Tucker et al. examined GPS locations for more than 50 species. In general, animal movements were shorter in areas with high human impact, likely owing to changed behaviors and physical l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

23
726
5
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 925 publications
(786 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
23
726
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The humanrelated factor was the only macroecological variable included in the best models for scavenger richness. All of these factors are known to affect vertebrates (e.g., Tucker et al, 2018), to predict extinction risk (Di Marco, Venter, Possingham, & Watson, 2018), and to negatively affect particular scavenger species, at least at the local scale (e.g., Bogoni et al, 2016;Lambertucci et al, 2009). HF combines information on human population density, harvest, livestock, land use, land change, and human accessibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The humanrelated factor was the only macroecological variable included in the best models for scavenger richness. All of these factors are known to affect vertebrates (e.g., Tucker et al, 2018), to predict extinction risk (Di Marco, Venter, Possingham, & Watson, 2018), and to negatively affect particular scavenger species, at least at the local scale (e.g., Bogoni et al, 2016;Lambertucci et al, 2009). HF combines information on human population density, harvest, livestock, land use, land change, and human accessibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, productivity, rainfall and temperature explained broad-scale vertebrate richness patterns (Hawkins et al, 2003). For example, human factors drive global avian species loss (Jetz, Wilcove & Dobson, 2007), affect macroecological patterns of seed-dispersal assemblages (Sebastián-González, Dalsgaard, Sandel, & Guimarães, 2015), and restrict local and regional movements of terrestrial mammal species (Tucker et al, 2018). Because of its pervasiveness, human impact may directly (e.g., by hunting, Benítez-López et al, 2017) and indirectly (e.g., by altering the habitat and amount of food available to species) affect the number of species in a community and their interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of taxa, human disturbance tends to reduce animal movementsbehaviors that can broadly affect species persistence and ecosystem function (Tucker et al, 2018). Few regions of the globe remain unaffected by the exploration and production of the next fuel or electron.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological and modeling advances have made it possible to collect more finely resolved data on the movement paths of individuals and to use the density and distribution of speeds and turning angles along those movement paths to infer behavioral states (Phillips, Patterson, Leroy, Pilling, & Nicol, 2015). Improvements in technology have made it possible to acquire large and finely resolved datasets on individual movements (Tucker et al, 2018) that are otherwise difficult to observe. Longer steps and smaller angles can indicate transit through less favorable habitat (Maciel & Lutscher, 2013;Osbourn, Connette, & Semlitsch, 2014), as seen in elephants (Duffy, Dai, Shannon, Slotow, & Page, 2011) and caribou (Avgar, Mosser, Brown, & Fryxell, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%