2018
DOI: 10.1111/bld.12211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving on: Transitions out of care for young people with learning disabilities in England and Sweden

Abstract: Accessible summary• When young people with learning disabilities leave the care system, they can experience many problems.• Here we describe some of these problems and what they do (or would like us to do) to improve things.• Young people do not always want the same things that professionals or family carers want.• We do not spend enough time listening to what young people can tell us. AbstractBackground: Young people with learning disabilities are frequently underrepresented

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scoping reviews can provide a descriptive account of the existing literature when time and resources are scarce, helping identify gaps for further study which can be easily summarised and shared (Arksey & O'Malley, 2005; Levac et al, 2010). Researchers have previously combined rapid reviews of the existing evidence with explorations of stakeholder experience to provide additional insight (Arksey & O'Malley, 2005; Jacobs et al, 2016; Ledger et al, 2022; Roberts et al, 2018). This is the approach we took for the purposes of our review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoping reviews can provide a descriptive account of the existing literature when time and resources are scarce, helping identify gaps for further study which can be easily summarised and shared (Arksey & O'Malley, 2005; Levac et al, 2010). Researchers have previously combined rapid reviews of the existing evidence with explorations of stakeholder experience to provide additional insight (Arksey & O'Malley, 2005; Jacobs et al, 2016; Ledger et al, 2022; Roberts et al, 2018). This is the approach we took for the purposes of our review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Of these, around two thirds will be invited to participate on the basis of demographic characteristics (gender; ethnicity; socio-economic context; geographical location; family circumstances), which broadly reflects the overall distribution in the wider BiB cohort, which is reflective of the population of Bradford. The remainder will be invited as members of groups often under-represented in genuinely participative co-production, including for instance disabled children, children in learning disability education, looked after children, refugee children, and children of refugees ( Roberts et al ., 2018 ). Recruitment in tranches will allow us to consider differences in young people’s experiences of the same age in different years ( Morrow & Crivello, 2015 ) and is likely to include issues such as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education, mental health and cost of living.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Of these, around two thirds will be invited to participate on the basis of demographic characteristics (gender; ethnicity; socio-economic context; geographical location; family circumstances), which broadly reflects the overall distribution in the wider BiB cohort. The remainder will be invited as members of groups often under-represented in genuinely participative co-production, including for instance children in special education, looked after children, and children of refugees (Roberts et al, 2018). Recruitment in tranches will allow us to consider differences in young people's experiences of the same age in different years (Morrow & Crivello, 2015) and is likely to include issues such as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education, mental health and cost of living.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%