Moving (Reflexively within) Structures. The Governance of Education for Sustainable Development in Germany

Abstract

The educational governance discourse aims at capturing how different actors, participating in a specific political process, coordinate their actions while working together within multi-actor policy networks. In Germany, such multi-actor policy networks have set up ambitious political goals on the implementation of education for sustainable development (ESD) that has resulted in the National Action Plan. The current domestic slogan “From Project to Structure” reveals the overall aim of scaling ESD. In this article, a governance perspective is used to examine how the actors involved in ESD in Germany coordinate their actions with each other. Six focus group discussions for different educational areas were conducted and analyzed with a structuring content analysis in MAXQDA. Additionally, an in-depth case comparison of the actors from different sectors (administration, politics, academia, civil society, and educational practice) was carried out. The results show sector-specific boundary work—the way in which actors construe, maintain, or even bridge boundaries when coordinating their actions in scaling ESD. Actors from the various sectors positioned themselves in patterns of more structure-immanent or more structure-transcending positionings. The conclusion shows that reflection and relational agency is pivotal for cooperation within multi-stakeholder governance networks and for moving strategically within structures.

Change from Within: Exploring Transformative Literacy in Public Administrations to Foster Sustainability Transitions

“…In the future, Paul would find it worthwhile to finish things, as there is a current tendency to start too many different things at once. From the perspective of the organization Paul can be classified as a person with a functional pattern of interaction [39].…”

“…In addition to small, trustworthy networks, Anja thinks that communication and narratives take a core role and finds merit in simple language, as well as translating politics into visions. Elsewhere this has been characterized as a structure-transcending positioning [39].…”

Why Context Matters for Educational Policy – Analysing Interactive Practice in the Governance of Education for Sustainable Development in Germany

“…The objective of the original study on which this article is based was to reconstruct the coordination of action 1 of the actors in volved in the various bodies of the GAP following the respective educational areas (early childhood education, school, vocational training, higher education, nonformal/informal learning, local authorities) (SingerBrodowski, Seggern, Duveneck, & Etzkorn 2020). In this article, we present an indepth analysis that fo cuses primarily on the implicit aspects of the coordination of action within the different educational areas and how the actors referred to each other.…”

Multi-Stakeholders Governance in Social Science Discipline: A Systematic Literature Review

“…The new Multi-stakeholder governance model has completely mainstreamed cl forms of politics and its interventions in a multi-stakeholder agenda (Blühdorn & Deflorian, 2019). The emphasizes that many issues must be addressed through political channels, with regard to time and also resources (Singer-Brodowski et al, 2020). The political issues such as political actors, political arena, political change, political consensus, political construction, political contestation, political dimensions, political economy, political effects, political entities, political input, political leadership, political legitimacy, political mobilization, political representation and restrictions, political system, political thrust, political value, and political will.…”