2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.07.20170050
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving Singing for Lung Health online: experience from a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Introduction Singing for Lung Health (SLH) is a popular arts-in-health activity for people with long-term respiratory conditions, which participants report provides biopsychosocial benefits, however research on impact is limited. The SHIELD trial, a randomised controlled, single (assessor) blind, trial of 12 weeks SLH vs usual care for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (n=120) was set-up to help to address this. The first group started face-to-face (5 sessions) before changing to online … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated certain restrictions on group activities such as singing 26 and dance, which are likely to impact the potential application of these findings in the short-term. However, developments including widespread immunisations, infection control measures, and remotely delivered singing and dance interventions 13 32 may help reduce risk. Additionally, although the majority of participants were highly positive about participation, there were exceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated certain restrictions on group activities such as singing 26 and dance, which are likely to impact the potential application of these findings in the short-term. However, developments including widespread immunisations, infection control measures, and remotely delivered singing and dance interventions 13 32 may help reduce risk. Additionally, although the majority of participants were highly positive about participation, there were exceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%