2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-019-01073-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving the Global Mental Health Debate Forward: How a Structural Competency Framework Can Apply to Global Mental Health Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of included articles are summarized in Table 3. Most (29/51) of the articles reviewed were editorials, commentaries, or letters to the editor 9,10,19,27‐52 . Thirteen of the articles reviewed were original research 21,53‐64 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of included articles are summarized in Table 3. Most (29/51) of the articles reviewed were editorials, commentaries, or letters to the editor 9,10,19,27‐52 . Thirteen of the articles reviewed were original research 21,53‐64 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What Kleinman and Jenkins are suggesting is that leaders within the MGMH need to think about risk and the social determinants of health in terms of structural and institutional terms rather than as isolated individual variables (Metzl and Hansen 2018). Typically, in psychiatry and the public health field more broadly, there is a rendering of the social as an aggregation of individual behaviors, or 'individuated risk calculators,' which overlooks the sociopolitical conditions in which behaviors/symptoms emerge and are given meaning (see, e.g., Povinelli 2011).The more recent emphasis on structural competency (Gajaria et al 2019) aligns well with community mental health approaches that politicize psychological suffering and attend to structural power (Pahwa et al 2020;Compton et al 2020;Moncrieff and Steingard 2019;Fine 2012). In contrast to the rendering of the social as an aggregation of the individual, Jenkins (2013) writes:…”
Section: Decolonizing Human Rights Discourse By Politicizing and Re-moralizing Human Sufferingmentioning
confidence: 99%