2021
DOI: 10.3389/fdsfr.2021.752581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving to a Personalized Approach in Respiratory Medicine. From Academic Research to Regulatory Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the considerable advances in omics technology and the role of omics in respiratory medicine, several methodological, practical, and ethical issues must be resolved before laboratory data can be translated into therapeutic applications. 7 …”
Section: Clinical Phenotypes and Endotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, despite the considerable advances in omics technology and the role of omics in respiratory medicine, several methodological, practical, and ethical issues must be resolved before laboratory data can be translated into therapeutic applications. 7 …”
Section: Clinical Phenotypes and Endotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the considerable advances in omics technology and the role of omics in respiratory medicine, several methodological, practical, and ethical issues must be resolved before laboratory data can be translated into therapeutic applications. 7 Although obstructive airway diseases, and thus also COPD, are heterogeneous, meaning that all patients are different and can present with a wide range of symptoms and underlying factors, the pivotal randomised controlled trials (RCTs) used to approve each new drug do not take heterogeneity into account. 8 The evidence supporting the use of currently available therapies is based on the results of major Phase III RCTs, which tend to be large, involving thousands of COPD patients selected solely based on the degree of obstruction, smoking history, and a symptom questionnaire or history of exacerbations.…”
Section: Clinical Phenotypes and Endotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%