2015
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies

Abstract: The propensity score is defined as a subject's probability of treatment selection, conditional on observed baseline covariates. Weighting subjects by the inverse probability of treatment received creates a synthetic sample in which treatment assignment is independent of measured baseline covariates. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score allows one to obtain unbiased estimates of average treatment effects. However, these estimates are only valid if there are no residual sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
2,805
3
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,187 publications
(2,824 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
2,805
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the methods described by Austin and Stuart27 to calculate standardized differences post‐IPTW adjustment to ensure all baseline covariates were equally distributed in the adjusted cohorts. We then built IPTW‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models to calculate adjusted HRs for the risk of each outcome and estimated IPTW‐adjusted survival curves using the approach of Cole and Hernán 28.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the methods described by Austin and Stuart27 to calculate standardized differences post‐IPTW adjustment to ensure all baseline covariates were equally distributed in the adjusted cohorts. We then built IPTW‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models to calculate adjusted HRs for the risk of each outcome and estimated IPTW‐adjusted survival curves using the approach of Cole and Hernán 28.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also included the type of major surgery (eg, orthopedic, vascular, thoracic, abdominal, or urologic/pelvic) and hospital teaching status as covariates in the model. Weighted standardized differences were used to compare baseline covariates between exposure groups in the weighted samples 16. All statistical analyses were conducted separately in patients undergoing elective surgery and in those undergoing urgent surgery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balance in the baseline covariates between the 2 procedure groups was assessed by calculating standardized differences separately for each of the covariates included in the PS model (18). The standardized difference for a continuous covariate is defined as the absolute difference in procedure group means divided by an estimate of the pooled SD.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%