OBM genet 2018
DOI: 10.21926/obm.genet.1802018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving Towards Routine Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Challenges Related to Women’s Autonomy

Abstract: Women's reproductive autonomy, and its translation into informed free choice regarding prenatal screening, is a dominant concept in the bioethical discourse concerning prenatal screening. This discourse is based on the premise that access to information regarding the pregnancy promotes autonomous decision-making. However, studies show that the offer of prenatal screening as a routine part of pregnancy care is not supported, to a large degree, by appropriate informed consent mechanisms. This means that the impl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is important to consider the minority of Canadian women and couples who prefer not to screen for DS, and the concern that routinization of NIPT (i.e. the test being covered and offered routinely) may exacerbate current pressures to screen and/or terminate following a diagnosis, thereby restricting their reproductive autonomy [24–26]. Pregnant women from Ontario, the only province covering NIPT for high-risk pregnancies at the time of the study, were willing to pay significantly less than women from all other provinces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is important to consider the minority of Canadian women and couples who prefer not to screen for DS, and the concern that routinization of NIPT (i.e. the test being covered and offered routinely) may exacerbate current pressures to screen and/or terminate following a diagnosis, thereby restricting their reproductive autonomy [24–26]. Pregnant women from Ontario, the only province covering NIPT for high-risk pregnancies at the time of the study, were willing to pay significantly less than women from all other provinces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Scholars and advocacy groups have expressed concerns regarding the potential consequences of "routinizing" noninvasive prenatal testing. 5,6 These concerns include an erosion of free and informed consent, in addition to the possibility of increased rates of pregnancy termination, which could lead to decreased prevalence of certain genetic conditions and may lead to decreased medical and social support for people and families living with these conditions. [7][8][9][10] Thus, it is important to empirically assess the ethical and societal acceptability of noninvasive prenatal testing's clinical implementation and coverage through public funding, to determine that they reflect the interests, needs and values of Canadians.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of prenatal diagnostic methods, such as ultrasound or amniocentesis, as a standard measure has been observed as an ongoing process in the last decades. The introduction of NIPT changes the ethical questions due to the medicalization of pregnancy and the normalization of prenatal quality control [ 42 ]. On the other hand, early detection of trisomies 13, 18, 21 or other genetic disorders is important to prepare expectant mothers and their partners to raise a child with special care needs or to take an informed decision about terminating the pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%