2014 IEEE 20th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/hpca.2014.6835940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MP3: Minimizing performance penalty for power-gating of Clos network-on-chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior works [6,7,9,24,28] as well as results given in this work show that the wakeup latency of on-chip network routers is around 6-12 cycles depending on implementation, which is quite sizable. More importantly, a packet may experience wakeup latency multiple times in the network as more than one router along the packet's path could be powered off.…”
Section: Blocking Problem In Conventional Power-gatingmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior works [6,7,9,24,28] as well as results given in this work show that the wakeup latency of on-chip network routers is around 6-12 cycles depending on implementation, which is quite sizable. More importantly, a packet may experience wakeup latency multiple times in the network as more than one router along the packet's path could be powered off.…”
Section: Blocking Problem In Conventional Power-gatingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This technique intends to filter out short idle periods that are less than the break-even time 2 to reduce the possibility of encountering a powered-off router. However, the timeout value cannot be too long (around 4 cycles [7,9]) as false filtering essentially wastes the remaining idle cycles that can be exploited by power-gating. Finally, several techniques have been proposed to power-gate individual components within a router [24,25,26].…”
Section: Blocking Problem In Conventional Power-gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a low-power instance in the multiple networks, the Catnap [13] guarantees full connectivity by keeping one subnet always active, while keeping other subnets power-gated to reduce unnecessary leakage power. Profiting from the excellent path diversity in the Clos network, the MP3 [14] utilizes minimal router resources and links to ensure all nodes are fully connected, and other remaining full-routers and partial-routers can be power-gated to achieve leakage power-saving. However, the Catnap merely increases the efficiency of power-gating in the architecture of multiple networks, and the MP3 is only applicable to Clos and other indirect networks.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originating the idea of guaranteeing full connectivity, these researches [12][13][14] provide a fully connected path to avoid the disconnection problem. The NoRD [12] introduces a bypass ring path to connect all nodes completely; then packets can be transmitted in the bypass ring to avoid long wake-up latency when meeting a sleeping router.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MP3 [6] is a methodology to power-gate routers in Clos networks inducing minimal performance overhead. MP3 maintains a set of routers powered on in such a way that all the processing elements in the network remain connected.…”
Section: Power Gating At the Router-level Granularitymentioning
confidence: 99%