Tools for High Performance Computing
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68564-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MPI Correctness Checking with Marmot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related research has also tried to improve the efficiency of error diagnosis [26]- [28], such as by using a daemon process [25]. Many of these methods rely on the MPI environment [32]- [34]. Concerning the algorithm itself, researchers have proposed the hardware faulttolerant algorithm [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related research has also tried to improve the efficiency of error diagnosis [26]- [28], such as by using a daemon process [25]. Many of these methods rely on the MPI environment [32]- [34]. Concerning the algorithm itself, researchers have proposed the hardware faulttolerant algorithm [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its initial form, the basic output of MUST is an HTML table that follows the format of Marmot [7]. In Marmot checks had to be implemented for each MPI call, even for the same error conditions, leading to significant code duplication of any error reporting.…”
Section: Mustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches for runtime error detection include ISP [3], Marmot [4], and Umpire [5]. ISP offers type matching for point-to-point calls while no publication details the algorithm in use.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marmot [4] provides various checks for argument restrictions and datatype commit state, which we adopt in MUST. These checksfall into the following classes:…”
Section: A Argument Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%