2013
DOI: 10.1271/bbb.130082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MPK6 Contributes to Non-Host Resistance toMagnaporthe oryzaeinArabidopsis thaliana

Abstract: The rate of entry of Magnaporthe oryzae into pen2 mpk6 plants was higher than that into pen2 plants. The infection hyphae in the pen2 mpk6 plants were longer than those in the pen2 plants. The proportion of branched hyphae development in the pen2 mpk6 plants was higher than that in the pen2 plants. These results suggest that MPK6 functions in both penetration and post-penetration resistance to M. oryzae in Arabidopsis thaliana.Key words: non-host resistance; penetration; post-penetration; Magnaporthe oryzae Ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we found that GmMPK6 overexpression in soybean enhanced resistance to P. sojae, while silencing of GmMPK6 resulted in the opposite phenotype, implicating its positive role in soybean defense against P. sojae (Figure 2). This supports the previous reports that MPK6 plays a positive role in disease resistance to B. cinerea, Magnaporthe oryzae, Peronospora parasitica and P. syringae in Arabidopsis (Galletti et al, 2011;Han et al, 2019;Menke et al, 2004;Okawa & Ishikawa, 2013;Rasmussen et al, 2012). In N. benthamiana, Arabidopsis or tomato, infection of P. sojae and P. infestans can activate MAPK signaling pathways (Cheng et al, 2012;Du et al, 2021;King et al, 2014;Zheng et al, 2014), suggesting that the MKK-MPK modules are signaling components immediately downstream of immune receptors and can be induced by phytophthora pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, we found that GmMPK6 overexpression in soybean enhanced resistance to P. sojae, while silencing of GmMPK6 resulted in the opposite phenotype, implicating its positive role in soybean defense against P. sojae (Figure 2). This supports the previous reports that MPK6 plays a positive role in disease resistance to B. cinerea, Magnaporthe oryzae, Peronospora parasitica and P. syringae in Arabidopsis (Galletti et al, 2011;Han et al, 2019;Menke et al, 2004;Okawa & Ishikawa, 2013;Rasmussen et al, 2012). In N. benthamiana, Arabidopsis or tomato, infection of P. sojae and P. infestans can activate MAPK signaling pathways (Cheng et al, 2012;Du et al, 2021;King et al, 2014;Zheng et al, 2014), suggesting that the MKK-MPK modules are signaling components immediately downstream of immune receptors and can be induced by phytophthora pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We have found that PEN2, powdery mildew resistance 5 (PMR5), Arabidopsis Gprotein beta subunit 1 (AGB1), and mildew locus O 2 (MLO2) are involved in both penetration resistance and post-penetration resistance to M. oryzae in Arabidopsis. [18][19][20][21][22][23] Recently, we have also shown that the RLK ERECTA is a positive regulator of NHR to M. oryzae in Arabidopsis. 24) In this study, we examined the function of BAK1 and SOBIR1 in NHR to M. oryzae in Arabidopsis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We have found that PEN2, powdery mildew resistance 5 (PMR5), Arabidopsis G-protein beta subunit 1 (AGB1), and mildew locus O 2 (MLO2) are involved in both penetration resistance and post-penetration resistance to M. oryzae in Arabidopsis. [11][12][13][14][15][16] We have also found that penetration resistance to M. oryzae in Col-0 was stronger than that of Ler in Arabidopsis. To examine the genetic basis underlying natural variation in the responses, we used a set of recombinant inbred lines derived from a Col × Ler cross and identified three quantitative trait loci (QTL) that govern the expression of NHR in Arabidopsis against M. oryzae.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…11,13) Fungal inoculation and quantification of cell entry and fungal growth were conducted as previously described. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Data were compared using Tukey's highly significant difference (HSD) tests. Calculations were performed on three data-sets (n = 3), and p < 0.05 indicated statistically significant effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%