2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mpropred: A machine learning (ML) driven Web-App for bioactivity prediction of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) antagonists

Abstract: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic emerged in 2019 and still requiring treatments with fast clinical translatability. Frequent occurrence of mutations in spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 led the consideration of an alternative therapeutic target to combat the ongoing pandemic. The main protease (Mpro) is such an attractive drug target due to its importance in maturating several polyproteins during the replication process. In the present study, we used a classification str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classification models for predicting SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors have also been developed using a variety of machine learning algorithms, such as random forest, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and Naïve Bayes. [55][56][57][58] Compared to our models, these models were developed based on datasets with much fewer SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors. Moreover, annotations of positives and negatives used to generate the training sets are not consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classification models for predicting SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors have also been developed using a variety of machine learning algorithms, such as random forest, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and Naïve Bayes. [55][56][57][58] Compared to our models, these models were developed based on datasets with much fewer SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors. Moreover, annotations of positives and negatives used to generate the training sets are not consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, annotations of positives and negatives used to generate the training sets are not consistent. For example, after collecting compounds with IC 50 values from literature, Ferdous et al 55 discarded compounds with IC 50 of 1-10 µM and assigned compounds with IC 50 < 0.5 µM as positives and compounds with IC 50 > 10 µM as negatives, while Mekni et al 56 excluded compounds with IC 50 > 98 µM as negatives. It is worth noting that the SARS-CoV-2 main protease has multiple binding sites that can bind compounds with distinct structural features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These MLTs have been employed by various researchers in a multitude of studies [ 40 ]. For example, Mpropred for the prediction of SARS-CoV-2 main protease antagonists [ 41 ], TargIDe for predicting the molecules with antibiofilm activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa [ 42 ], EBOLApred for predicting cell entry inhibitors against the Ebola virus [ 43 ], and StackHCV for the identification of inhibitors against the NS5 protein of the Hepatitis C virus [ 44 ]. Similarly, we have utilized these techniques to create predictive algorithms such as AVCpred for predicting general effective antiviral compounds [ 15 ]: AVPpred, the first algorithm for predicting antiviral peptides [ 16 ], AVP-IC50 Pred for predicting antiviral peptides activity in terms of the IC 50 , i.e., the half-maximal inhibitory concentration [ 17 ], HIVprotI for predicting and designing inhibitors targeting Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) proteins [ 18 ], and anti-flavi for predicting and designing various novel antiviral compounds, particularly for flaviviruses [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%