2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR Cholangiopancreatography: 1.5T versus 3T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilisation of MRI at 1.5T is considered the clinical standard in most centres. However, high-field MRI of the abdomen at 3T has been proven to be feasible over the last few years [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. An increase in the magnetic field strength is associated with increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilisation of MRI at 1.5T is considered the clinical standard in most centres. However, high-field MRI of the abdomen at 3T has been proven to be feasible over the last few years [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. An increase in the magnetic field strength is associated with increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the magnetic field strength can provoke artefacts because of changes in tissue susceptibility, chemical shift, or signal heterogeneities due to radiofrequency (RF) wavelength effects [8,14,15]. Furthermore, the energy deposited by RF waves is known to be restrictive at high-field imaging, as the RF absorption increases proportionally to the square of the static magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%