1989
DOI: 10.1177/107769908906600412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mr. Gates Goes Electronic: The What and Why Questions in Local TV News

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent to which events occurring in society are covered by the news depends on how congruent those events are with the ''news values'' implicit in how journalists and editors decide what is presented as news (Gatlung & Ruge, 1965). Although there is no formal canon of these news values, various conceptualizations of newsworthiness center around such concepts as timeliness, geographic proximity, cultural proximity, importance, novelty, and conflict (see Abbott & Brassfield, 1989;Berkowitz, 1990;Boyd, 1994;Clayman & Reisner, 1998;Fuller, 1996;Harcup & O'Neill, 2001;Harmon, 1989;Herbert, 2000).…”
Section: Methodology and Criticism Of Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The extent to which events occurring in society are covered by the news depends on how congruent those events are with the ''news values'' implicit in how journalists and editors decide what is presented as news (Gatlung & Ruge, 1965). Although there is no formal canon of these news values, various conceptualizations of newsworthiness center around such concepts as timeliness, geographic proximity, cultural proximity, importance, novelty, and conflict (see Abbott & Brassfield, 1989;Berkowitz, 1990;Boyd, 1994;Clayman & Reisner, 1998;Fuller, 1996;Harcup & O'Neill, 2001;Harmon, 1989;Herbert, 2000).…”
Section: Methodology and Criticism Of Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…That may explain why critics of journalism have, since the development of the Penny Press, focused on the information function of journalism to argue publicly for the distinction between "proper" reporting and sensational tabloid attempts to inform the public. A number of studies (Adams, 1978;Davie & Lee, 1995;Dominick, Wurtzel, & Lometti, 1975;Harmon, 1989;Hofstetter & Dozier, 1986;Ryu, 1982;Scott and Gobetz, 1992;Slattery, 1994;Wulfemeyer, 1982) have attempted to distinguish between tabloid and standard news content, but have ignored--for the most part--the potential formal differences between these two news genres. The verdict is that proper journalism serves as society's unbiased watchdog by focusing primarily on substantive and timely political and economic issues while tabloid journalists openly favor coverage of scandal, crime, human tragedy, and other disruptions of everyday life.…”
Section: Evaluations Of Newsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among these are studies of reporters rather than editors (Whitney and Becker 1982), female gatekeepers (Bleske 1991), photographers (Bissell 2000), gatekeepers from radio stations (Bass 1969), from TV stations (Harmon 1989) and from online news media (Singer 2001;Singer et al 2011). Furthermore, the research field has been concerned with the different processes and criteria used for selection and construction of the final news products.…”
Section: The Original Concept Of Gatekeepingmentioning
confidence: 98%