2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR image reconstruction using cosupport constraints and group sparsity regularisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, there are numerous voxels near the course dividers that are bereft of flag, either from fat concealment or from blood stream pay. Such voxels don't give data about the predisposition field [18].…”
Section: Improve Quality Of Mr Images By Energy Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, there are numerous voxels near the course dividers that are bereft of flag, either from fat concealment or from blood stream pay. Such voxels don't give data about the predisposition field [18].…”
Section: Improve Quality Of Mr Images By Energy Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available prior used in classical CS-MRI can be the sparsity in specific transform domains (e.g., gradient and wavelet) [2,5,6], as well as a more fixable sparse representation obtained from data via dictionary learning [7][8][9][10]. In addition, the structural prior information is drawing increased attention, because it can be acquired from a known high-resolution reference image [11][12][13] and introduces support information [14,15] or structural sparsity (e.g., group sparsity and block sparsity) [16][17][18] into the reconstruction model based on the union of subspaces theory [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic CS-MRI methods aim to accurately reconstruct MR images from highly under-sampled k-space data. Over the last ten years, plenty of classic CS-MRI methods [2][3][4][5] have been proposed to achieve accurate CS-MRI reconstruction. The issues encountered by the classic CS-MRI methods are that: (a) at present, it is difficult to find a suitable sparsifying transform or decomposition tool to accurately capture complex image details; and (b) the classic CS-MRI methods usually require multiple iterative calculations, which may result in relatively long reconstruction time and thus make the reconstruction not-realtime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%