1997
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.1.9207531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR imaging of lumbar spondylolysis: the importance of ancillary observations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second important finding by Frank and Miller 1 was the abnormal posterior wedging of L5, which has been considered an important predictor of spondylolysis since then. [6][7][8][9] It has been known for a long time that a certain degree of posterior wedging is normal, 3,4 and we could confirm this in our control group, in which a mean percentage wedging was seen of 11.9%. In only 5 patients, the percentage-posterior wedging exceeded 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A second important finding by Frank and Miller 1 was the abnormal posterior wedging of L5, which has been considered an important predictor of spondylolysis since then. [6][7][8][9] It has been known for a long time that a certain degree of posterior wedging is normal, 3,4 and we could confirm this in our control group, in which a mean percentage wedging was seen of 11.9%. In only 5 patients, the percentage-posterior wedging exceeded 20%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…[1][2][3] There is a large amount of literature on a similar marrow signal intensity pattern in joints outside the spine where symptoms and abnormal marrow signal intensity in long bones correlate with clinical symptoms and trauma or response to stress. [10][11][12][13][14] Likewise, the association of type 1 pedicle marrow signal intensity changes with pars and pedicle fractures and degenerative facet changes suggests they are related to biomechanical stress created by abnormal spinal segment motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] In these reports, the signal intensity changes were categorized in a manner similar to vertebral body endplate marrow changes associated with degenerative disk disease that were described by Modic. 6 Although these changes in the MR signal intensity take 3 main forms (types 1-3), of primary interest here are the type 1 pedicle marrow signal intensity changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many indirect signs of unilateral spondylolysis such as contour bulging of the involved pars interarticularis, reactive sclerosis of the contralateral pedicle, asymmetric neural arch, deviation or step-off of the spinous process, and widening of the spinal canal with anterolisthesis or posterior subluxation of the posterior element (Fig. 6) [11,37]. Sclerosis of the contralateral pedicle showing the "dense pedicle sign" should be differentiated from other diseases, such as osteoid osteoma and Paget's disease.…”
Section: Unilateral Spondylolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ulmer et al [37] found that a widened sagittal diameter of the spinal canal, wedging of the posterior aspect of the vertebral body at the level of spondylolysis, and bone marrow signal changes of the pedicle adjacent to the isthmic spondylolysis were useful in making a diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis without or with spondylolisthesis. Epidural fat interposition between the dura mater and the L5 spinous process is known as an indirect sign on midsagittal MR images of the lumbar spine [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%