2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2636-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the quality of MR imaging and level of adverse effects with increasing concentrations of gastrografin. This is a prospective study with 24 healthy volunteers which were randomised into four groups receiving 50%, 25%, 10% and 0% gastrografin. The endpoint was bowel image quality based on distension, signal homogeneity and wall delineation evaluated by three independent radiologists, and the maximum bowel diameter at three different levels. The subjects also scored any adverse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several new contrast agents for MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract have been proposed and are classified as positive, negative, or biphasic [30,31]. Because MR fluoroscopy is a heavily T2-weighted sequence the contrast medium for MR enteroclysis must have high signal intensity on T2-weighted images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several new contrast agents for MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract have been proposed and are classified as positive, negative, or biphasic [30,31]. Because MR fluoroscopy is a heavily T2-weighted sequence the contrast medium for MR enteroclysis must have high signal intensity on T2-weighted images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why we did without, while relying on the relaxing effect of the i.v. injected antiperistaltic agent, as reported previously [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a general rule, as the osmolality of the agent increases, the side effects (nausea, diarrhea, and flatulence) increase and the palatability decreases [16,17]. Commonly used agents include 0.1% low-density barium sulfate suspension (VoLumen, E-Z-EM, NY), as well as polyethylene glycol and methylcellulose.…”
Section: Small Bowel Distensionmentioning
confidence: 98%