2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep16645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR-PheWAS: hypothesis prioritization among potential causal effects of body mass index on many outcomes, using Mendelian randomization

Abstract: Observational cohort studies can provide rich datasets with a diverse range of phenotypic variables. However, hypothesis-driven epidemiological analyses by definition only test particular hypotheses chosen by researchers. Furthermore, observational analyses may not provide robust evidence of causality, as they are susceptible to confounding, reverse causation and measurement error. Using body mass index (BMI) as an exemplar, we demonstrate a novel extension to the phenome-wide association study (pheWAS) approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(85 reference statements)
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings provide strong support for undertaking RCTs in obese people to test the effect of triacylglycerol reduction and glycaemic control on CHD risk. Several MR studies have previously examined the association of BMI with CHD and CHD risk factors [11,12,14,24,25]. Our results are broadly consistent with those, including our finding of no evidence for the causal association between BMI and LDL-cholesterol [12,24,26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our findings provide strong support for undertaking RCTs in obese people to test the effect of triacylglycerol reduction and glycaemic control on CHD risk. Several MR studies have previously examined the association of BMI with CHD and CHD risk factors [11,12,14,24,25]. Our results are broadly consistent with those, including our finding of no evidence for the causal association between BMI and LDL-cholesterol [12,24,26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…‘area under the BMI curve’) when compared to a one-time measure or even repeated measures of BMI recorded during cohort studies. 46 This might account for the numerically, albeit non-significantly, greater estimated causal effect of BMI on incident AF we obtained using genetic instruments compared to observational estimates. Similar discordance in instrumental and observational estimates has been reported for the association between BMI-increasing genetic variants and coronary disease risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…40 Alternatively, pleiotropy – in which the selected genetic variants mediate AF risk through a non-BMI pathway – might account for some of the discordance in risk estimates. 46 The association between the genetic instruments and AF, however, remained significant after adjustment for several possible pleiotropic mediators including hypertension and coronary heart disease. In addition, our finding that adjustment for observed BMI nullified the statistical association between the genetic instruments and AF supports BMI as the causal mediator of the association between the genetic instruments and incident AF, and argues against a major contribution from pleiotropic effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A novel extension to the phenome-wide association study (pheWAS) approach20, using Bonferroni corrections, permutation testing and estimates of the false discovery rate to consider the strength of results given the number of tests performed demonstrated strongly associated outcomes included DBP and BMI with lipid profiles. They also found novel evidence of effects of BMI on a global self-worth score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%