2018
DOI: 10.1142/s2424905x18500034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR Safe Robot Assisted Needle Access of the Brain: Preclinical Study

Abstract: We report the results of preclinical experiments for direct MRI-guided needle interventions in the brain. An MR Safe robot was incorporated into an intraoperative MRI system. Deep regions of the brain simulated in a cranial mockup were targeted with a needle under robotic assistance. The 3D accuracy of in-scanner targeting at an average depth of 95[Formula: see text]mm was 1.55[Formula: see text]mm, with no manual corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some used alternative actuation approaches such as pneumatics, [13] tendondriven transmissions, [14] or piezoelectric motors. [15] For example, Stoianovici et al [16,17] presented a needle positioning robot with custom-made MR-safe pneumatic motors for control over a remote-center-of-motion (RCM) mechanism with three additional manual degrees of freedom (DoFs) that must be locked independently by the surgeon. The robot could be mounted to the patient table or to a Mayfield head frame, although its size would also only accommodate unilateral procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some used alternative actuation approaches such as pneumatics, [13] tendondriven transmissions, [14] or piezoelectric motors. [15] For example, Stoianovici et al [16,17] presented a needle positioning robot with custom-made MR-safe pneumatic motors for control over a remote-center-of-motion (RCM) mechanism with three additional manual degrees of freedom (DoFs) that must be locked independently by the surgeon. The robot could be mounted to the patient table or to a Mayfield head frame, although its size would also only accommodate unilateral procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, mechanical fixtures, such as the Leksell frame used in stereotactic neurosurgery, are typically used to restrain the patient movement. Table-mounted robotic systems have been investigated for MRIguided procedures of various applications, such as prostate cancer therapy [8][9][10][11][12], stereotactic neurosurgery [13][14][15][16], facet joint treatment [17], breast tissue biopsy [18], and in-room ultrasound fusion [19]. In comparison, a body-mounted robot is mounted directly to a patient using straps or other methods, minimizing the effect of patient movement by moving with him/her.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, mechanical fixtures are usually employed to prevent patient motion, like the Leksell frame in neurosurgery. Table-mounted robots have been developed broadly for MRI-guided percutaneous interventions including prostate cancer therapy [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], stereotactic neurosurgery, [20], [21], [22], [23] and breast tissue biopsy [24], [25]. Body-mounted robots, by contrast, are attached directly to the patient through straps or screws, minimizing any effects of patient motion by moving with the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%