2012
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.11.6954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI and CT of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Abstract: Imaging can detect effect of radiation on surrounding structures. The imaging findings that help to differentiate nasopharyngeal carcinoma from simulating lesions are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
83
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) provides the greatest imaging accuracy for most head and neck tumors. However, for GTVs near the base of the skull, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT for detection of tumor involvement of the parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal spaces, skull base foramina, cranial nerves, and bone marrow (i.e., of the clivus) in cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses, and esthesioneuroblastoma (Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek and King 2012 ;Lloyd et al 2000 ;Ng et al 1997 ;Som 1997 ). MRI with fat-saturated, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images also provides superior sensitivity for detection of perineural spread to the skull base in cases of locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and malignant salivary gland tumors, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma or high-grade acinic cell carcinoma (Gandhi et al 2011 ;Hanna et al 2007 ;Nemzek et al 1998 ).…”
Section: Delineating the Primary Gross Tumor Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) provides the greatest imaging accuracy for most head and neck tumors. However, for GTVs near the base of the skull, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT for detection of tumor involvement of the parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal spaces, skull base foramina, cranial nerves, and bone marrow (i.e., of the clivus) in cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses, and esthesioneuroblastoma (Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek and King 2012 ;Lloyd et al 2000 ;Ng et al 1997 ;Som 1997 ). MRI with fat-saturated, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images also provides superior sensitivity for detection of perineural spread to the skull base in cases of locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and malignant salivary gland tumors, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma or high-grade acinic cell carcinoma (Gandhi et al 2011 ;Hanna et al 2007 ;Nemzek et al 1998 ).…”
Section: Delineating the Primary Gross Tumor Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR imaging revealed enlargement or abnormal enhancement of the mandibular nerve (V3), obliteration of the neural fat pads in the foramen oval, or foraminal enlargement. Mandibular nerve involvement is best seen on coronal T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat saturation [41,42] (Fig. 13).…”
Section: Perineural Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR imaging provides excellent visualization of the soft tissue planes of the nasopharynx and is superior to CT for detecting perineural spread of tumor. Lymphadenopathy is present in up to 90 % of patients, with the retropharyngeal chain often being the first involved nodal site [42] (Fig. 13).…”
Section: Nasopharyngeal Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-For CN IX and X: Cover jugular foramen -For CN V: Cover pterygopalatine fossa, cavernous sinus, foramen rotundum, and foramen ovale -For CN VI: Cover cavernous sinus • MRI provides superior assessment of skull base involvement and tumor invasion into soft tissue structures compared to CT scan (Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek & King 2012 ), in particular.…”
Section: Diagnostic Workup Relevant For Target Volume Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%