2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI-Based Intelligence Quotient (IQ) Estimation with Sparse Learning

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel framework for IQ estimation using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. In particular, we devise a new feature selection method based on an extended dirty model for jointly considering both element-wise sparsity and group-wise sparsity. Meanwhile, due to the absence of large dataset with consistent scanning protocols for the IQ estimation, we integrate multiple datasets scanned from different sites with different scanning parameters and protocols. In this way, there is large … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pairing factor was included for each subject. BDI and scanner hardware maintenance (<2 months before maintenance of a RF transmitter coil or RF amplifier) were included as covariates (Mcdaniel, 2005;Wang, Wee, Suk, Tang, & Shen, 2015;Webb, Weber, Mundy, & Killgore, 2014). All reported p-values were family-wise-error corrected on cluster level at p < .05, with an uncorrected voxel-level threshold of p < .001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pairing factor was included for each subject. BDI and scanner hardware maintenance (<2 months before maintenance of a RF transmitter coil or RF amplifier) were included as covariates (Mcdaniel, 2005;Wang, Wee, Suk, Tang, & Shen, 2015;Webb, Weber, Mundy, & Killgore, 2014). All reported p-values were family-wise-error corrected on cluster level at p < .05, with an uncorrected voxel-level threshold of p < .001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finn et al (2015) also established the relevance of the connectivity profiles to behavior by demonstrating, in a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation analysis, that functional connectivity profiles can be used to predict the fundamental cognitive trait of fluid intelligence across subjects. It shows that the characteristic connectivity patterns are distributed throughout the brain, but the fron- Wang et al (2015) employed multi-and single-kernel Support Vector Regression (SVR) to predict FSIQ from gray and white matter regional volumetry in typical children and adolescents. The authors report an optimal R2 of 0.516, remarkably higher than that of the total brain volume.…”
Section: Predicting Intelligence From Neuroimaging Data the State-ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression based on nonlinear models was reported in 5 (17%) studies. These include polynomial Kernel SVR (Wang et al 2015), corre-lation kernel ridge regression (KRR) (He et al 2020;Li et al 2019), dice overlap KRR (Kong et al 2019) and deep learning, based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), graph neural networks and fully connected deep networks (He et al 2020) or recurrent neural networks (RNNs) (Fan et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%