2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijbm.2013.052943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI-based knee image for personal identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Tc is the training set of class c, t is a feature vector from Tc, |x| is the length of the feature vector x, xf is the value of image feature f, Wf is the Fisher discriminant score of feature f, |Tc| is the number of training samples of class c, d(x,c) is the computed distance from a given sample x to class c, and p is the exponent, which is set to −5 as thoroughly discussed in (Orlov et al, 2008). The comprehensive set of image content descriptors and the selection of the informative image features allow the application of the algorithm to a broad variety of complex image data (Shamir et al, 2008a;Shamir et al, 2012;Shamir, 2012;Shamir & Tarakhovsky, 2012;Shamir, Holincheck & Wallin, 2013;Shamir, 2013). Source code for the method is publicly available .…”
Section: Galaxy Morphology Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Tc is the training set of class c, t is a feature vector from Tc, |x| is the length of the feature vector x, xf is the value of image feature f, Wf is the Fisher discriminant score of feature f, |Tc| is the number of training samples of class c, d(x,c) is the computed distance from a given sample x to class c, and p is the exponent, which is set to −5 as thoroughly discussed in (Orlov et al, 2008). The comprehensive set of image content descriptors and the selection of the informative image features allow the application of the algorithm to a broad variety of complex image data (Shamir et al, 2008a;Shamir et al, 2012;Shamir, 2012;Shamir & Tarakhovsky, 2012;Shamir, Holincheck & Wallin, 2013;Shamir, 2013). Source code for the method is publicly available .…”
Section: Galaxy Morphology Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging (ISFRI) has published positional statements regarding the use of conventional radiographs and PMCT for forensic identification [22,23]. However, the potential of MR for comparative identification remains underinvestigated and literature on this topic is scarce [10,13,14]. Overall, the comparison between MR and CT (regardless of whether it is antemortem or postmortem) is more challenging than intramodal comparison (MR to MR or CT to CT) due to the inherent differences between CT, which provides high resolution and edge detail of bone, and MR, which provides high contrast for soft tissue [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, CT allows for comparisons with radiographs [11]. MR imaging of osseous tissues has less resolution and edge detail than radiographs or CT [12] and has thus only rarely been deemed an appropriate tool for radiologic identification [13,14]. Documentation of radiologic identification for personal ID of living individuals is rare in the literature [15], as ID for living individuals typically relies on ID-documents and fingerprints (https://www.fedpol.admin.ch/fedpol/de/home/ sicherheit/personenidentifikation.html).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending their research from identification using knee Xrays, Shamir et al [69] proposed later their work on using MRI-based knee images for person identification. The authors showed that the accuracy for person identification using knee MRI scans is significantly higher than random.…”
Section: D Magnet Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%