2013
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10017-1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI Determination of Knee Effusion Volume: A Cadaveric Study

Abstract: Background: There is currently limited literature on quantitative determination of knee effusion volume using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, MRI has been shown to be sensitive Supplemental material online at jultrasoundmed.org enough to detect 1 mL of fluid injected into cadaveric specimens and has potential to estimate the amount of fluid in a knee joint to within 1 mL. 13,14 Despite the data showing the differences in sensitivity of ultrasound and MRI in detecting knee effusion, there is limited research to guide clinicians on when these modalities should be used or if a thorough physical examination of the knee is sufficient. Previous systematic reviews on physical examination and ultrasound accuracy have relied on using ultrasound as a gold standard or found very few studies when using MRI as a gold standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, MRI has been shown to be sensitive Supplemental material online at jultrasoundmed.org enough to detect 1 mL of fluid injected into cadaveric specimens and has potential to estimate the amount of fluid in a knee joint to within 1 mL. 13,14 Despite the data showing the differences in sensitivity of ultrasound and MRI in detecting knee effusion, there is limited research to guide clinicians on when these modalities should be used or if a thorough physical examination of the knee is sufficient. Previous systematic reviews on physical examination and ultrasound accuracy have relied on using ultrasound as a gold standard or found very few studies when using MRI as a gold standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI using axial T2 weighted turbo spin echo (T2WTSE) and sagittal SPACE (Sampling Perfection with application optimized contrast using different angle evolutions) were reported to be highly correlated with the known volumes of saline injection into cadavers (r = 0.993 and 0.996, p < 0.001). 39 It was also reported that in patients with knee osteoarthritis, an automated system for knee joint effusion volume measurement using T2-weight MRI images achieved excellent correlations with manual quantification (r = 0.98; p < 0.0001) and invasive knee aspiration (r = 0.88; p = 0.0008). 40 It was also reported that manual calculation had excellent inter-observer reliability (r = 0.935; p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 86%