2021
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI‐enema for the assessment of pelvic intestinal anastomotic integrity

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guy et al compared MRI-enema with fluoroscopic water-soluble contrast enema in the assessment of pelvic intestinal anastomotic integrity and found that MRI-enema offers a more detailed assessment of anastomotic leakage, providing additional pelvic information and an equivalent patient experience [ 25 ]. Although patients received MRI examination without enema in our study, the accuracy was satisfactory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guy et al compared MRI-enema with fluoroscopic water-soluble contrast enema in the assessment of pelvic intestinal anastomotic integrity and found that MRI-enema offers a more detailed assessment of anastomotic leakage, providing additional pelvic information and an equivalent patient experience [ 25 ]. Although patients received MRI examination without enema in our study, the accuracy was satisfactory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guy et al has compared MRI-enema with uoroscopic water-soluble contrast enema in the assessment of pelvic intestinal anastomotic integrity, and found MRI-enema offers more detailed assessment of anastomotic leak, with additional pelvic information and equivalent patient experience [24] . Although patients received MR examination without enema in our study, the accurate was satisfying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%