2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI grading method for active and chronic spinal changes in spondyloarthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients contacted the clinic because of a knee joint effusion, none received biological treatment, but all received standard disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). [16,17]. The methods have proven a reliable inter-and intra-observer agreement with kappa values in the range of 0.62-1.0.…”
Section: Collection Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All patients contacted the clinic because of a knee joint effusion, none received biological treatment, but all received standard disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). [16,17]. The methods have proven a reliable inter-and intra-observer agreement with kappa values in the range of 0.62-1.0.…”
Section: Collection Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The clinical scorings comprise Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), physicians' global score on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The radiological examinations included radiography and MRI of the SIJ and spine [16,17]. Plasma from age-and gender-matched healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 35) served as controls (Table 1).…”
Section: Collection Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone spur: Bright signal on T1-weighted images extending from the vertebral endplate towards the adjacent vertebra (spine) Ankylosis: Bright signal on T1-weighted images extending across the sacroiliac joints or extending from one vertebra being continuous with the adjacent vertebra (spine) separately or as global score Madsen and Jurik, 2010b;Østergaard et al 2009]. The validation of the methods for damage assessment is limited and their value is not yet clarified.…”
Section: B Structural Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in the spine, the level of detail in the proposed MRI assessment systems has varied markedly. Most scoring systems have provided a "global" score of each discovertebral unit (DVU) 12,13 , whereas more recently the Canada-Denmark method, in addition to providing detailed definitions of inflammatory and structural pathologies 14,15 , also defined a number of distinct anatomical locations (e.g., anterior and posterior corners of the vertebrae and the facet joints) of each DVU, where these pathologies could be evaluated 16,17 . Subsequently, the assessment of the structural components has been developed into scoring systems of fat (The Fat Spondyloarthritis Spine Score) 18 and bone proliferation 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%