2006
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.04.1853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI of Meniscal Lesions: Soft-Copy (PACS) and Hard-Copy Evaluation Versus Reviewer Experience

Abstract: Differences in the diagnostic performance of suspected meniscal tears depend on reviewer experience rather than on the type of documentation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that standing full-length radiographs are as equally reliable as a scanogram for measuring LLD. Other studies report no differences in the reliability, accuracy, and diagnostic performance of digital imaging versus hard-copy radiographs [1,2,4,6,7,9,13] . By comparing all the extremity lengths and angular variations, and on valuating the difference in data, the digitally acquired images in PACS permit a smooth transition in clinical reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They concluded that standing full-length radiographs are as equally reliable as a scanogram for measuring LLD. Other studies report no differences in the reliability, accuracy, and diagnostic performance of digital imaging versus hard-copy radiographs [1,2,4,6,7,9,13] . By comparing all the extremity lengths and angular variations, and on valuating the difference in data, the digitally acquired images in PACS permit a smooth transition in clinical reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sanfridsson [11] warned that protocols must be established to appropriately measure distances and angles on these digital images. An investigation of the use of softcopy digital imaging concluded PACS had minimal influence in diagnostic errors [7], and as long as high-quality monitors are used at the workstations, interpretation of PACS-derived radiographs is substantially similar to that for hard-copy radiographic analysis [3,7]. Digital measurement on PACS allows enhancements of images, for example, brightness, contrast, and magnification can be adjusted to better see important landmarks that are used for measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The widespread installation of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) has changed working methods, and today, the reading of radiological images on screen is largely accepted [1][2][3]. However, in France, PACS at different institutions are not yet connected, and physicians rarely work in the health facility concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-screen evaluation of digital imaging does not affect the accuracy of interpretation. [6][7][8] However, when printed digital radiographs are combined with acetate overlay templating, correct component size is predicted accurately only 69% of the time. 9 Studies investigating the accuracy of digital templating have produced varied results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%