2023
DOI: 10.3390/rs15123121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MSAFNet: Multiscale Successive Attention Fusion Network for Water Body Extraction of Remote Sensing Images

Abstract: Water body extraction is a typical task in the semantic segmentation of remote sensing images (RSIs). Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) outperform traditional methods in mining visual features; however, due to the inherent convolutional mechanism of the network, spatial details and abstract semantic representations at different levels are difficult to capture accurately at the same time, and then the extraction results decline to become suboptimal, especially on narrow areas and boundaries. To address… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparative analysis, eleven advanced approaches were selected: U-Net [20], DeepLabV3+ [22], DANet [30], ResUNet-a [48], DASSN [35], HCANet [36], RAANet [56], SCAttNet [55], A2-FPN [54], LANet [38], and SAPNet [57]. Notably, U-Net [20], DeepLabV3+ [22], and DANet [30] were initially developed for natural image segmentation, while ResUNeta [48], DASSN [35], HCANet [36], RAANet [56], SCAttNet [55], A2-FPN [54], LANet [38], MSAFNet [67], CLCFormer [68], and SAPNet [57] represent recent state-of-the-art methodologies specifically designed for RSI segmentation.…”
Section: Implement Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparative analysis, eleven advanced approaches were selected: U-Net [20], DeepLabV3+ [22], DANet [30], ResUNet-a [48], DASSN [35], HCANet [36], RAANet [56], SCAttNet [55], A2-FPN [54], LANet [38], and SAPNet [57]. Notably, U-Net [20], DeepLabV3+ [22], and DANet [30] were initially developed for natural image segmentation, while ResUNeta [48], DASSN [35], HCANet [36], RAANet [56], SCAttNet [55], A2-FPN [54], LANet [38], MSAFNet [67], CLCFormer [68], and SAPNet [57] represent recent state-of-the-art methodologies specifically designed for RSI segmentation.…”
Section: Implement Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [27] proposed a remote-sensing-based method for mapping channel activity using the MNDWI index combined with the Otsu method based on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, applying the method with the Lower Yellow River as a case study. Lyu et al [28] developed a MSAFNet (multiscale successive attention fusion network) model for extracting water bodies from remote sensing images; they tested their method on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Lake (QTPL) and the Land-cOVEr Domain Adaptive semantic segmentation (LoveDA) datasets and achieved a high mapping accuracy (i.e., overall accuracy of 98.97% on the QTPL dataset and 95.87% on the LoveDA dataset). Lu et al [29] proposed a model for extracting river networks by combining DEM, a Landsat-derived global surface water occurrence (GSWO) dataset, and Sentinel-2 imagery, and they applied the model to conduct a case study across the Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, finding results consistent with the actual river network.…”
Section: Water-related Area Mapping Derived From Satellite Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is accomplished through parallel channel-specific attention and spatial-specific attention, which enhance the differentiation between the foreground and background. MSAFNet [26] is a network that employs multiple attentional modules to extract both low-level and high-level local features. These multi-level features are then aggregated through the feature fusion module (FFM) to improve the mapping of water body edges, directly enhancing the segmentation of water bodies.…”
Section: Cnn-based Semantic Segmentation For Water Body Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%