2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.103110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MTCNet: Multitask consistency network with single temporal supervision for semi-supervised building change detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 lists the quantitative change detection results obtained on the test set from training the models on limited fractions of the labeled training set, i.e., 40% (n = 12), 20 % (n = 6), and 10% (n = 3). The last column of Table 2 lists the results obtained from training the models on the entire labeled training set (i.e., 100%), even though it is generally assumed in semi-supervised learning that the size of the unlabeled dataset is considerably larger than that of the labeled dataset (e.g., [43,45]). However, this column was added to test whether the proposed method manages to perform on par with the supervised method under no label scarcity.…”
Section: Change Detection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 lists the quantitative change detection results obtained on the test set from training the models on limited fractions of the labeled training set, i.e., 40% (n = 12), 20 % (n = 6), and 10% (n = 3). The last column of Table 2 lists the results obtained from training the models on the entire labeled training set (i.e., 100%), even though it is generally assumed in semi-supervised learning that the size of the unlabeled dataset is considerably larger than that of the labeled dataset (e.g., [43,45]). However, this column was added to test whether the proposed method manages to perform on par with the supervised method under no label scarcity.…”
Section: Change Detection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two accuracy metrics were used for the quantitative assessment of predicted changes: F1 score and intersection over union (IoU). The combination of the F1 score and IoU is commonly used for performance assessments in change detection studies, e.g., [45]. Formulas for the metrics are given in Equations 5 and 6, where TP, FP, and FN represent the number of true positive, false positive, and false negative pixels, respectively.…”
Section: Accuracy Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remote Sens. 2024, 16, x FOR PEER REVIEW 16 of 36 • Model Perturbation Space [128,129]. This approach involves altering the model itself to create pseudo-labels for unlabeled samples using different models and then supervising them mutually.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%