2008
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.22169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mTOR expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its correlation with survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other agents, including everolimus and sirolimus, are currently in phase II clinical trials 56. A combination of an mTOR inhibitor with other standard or targeted therapies might be needed,57,58 as mTOR expression does not correlate with survival of patients 59…”
Section: Other Potential Therapeutic Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other agents, including everolimus and sirolimus, are currently in phase II clinical trials 56. A combination of an mTOR inhibitor with other standard or targeted therapies might be needed,57,58 as mTOR expression does not correlate with survival of patients 59…”
Section: Other Potential Therapeutic Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In breast cancer, p-mTOR expression is predominantly detected in the cytoplasm and is significantly associated with short RFS, but does not correlate with any clinicopathological factors, including stage, histological grade, and lymph node involvement (Zhou et al, 2004). Rajan et al found that p-mTOR expression is unrelated to survival in pancreatic cancer (Rajan et al, 2008). Boone et al reported that p-mTOR expression is only associated with a lesser degree of tumour differentiation (Boone et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anticancer effect of RAD001, a rapamycin analogue, has also been shown in advanced gastric cancer (Muro et al, 2008). However, few studies have assessed correlations of mTOR expression in human cancers with either clinocopathological features or outcomes (Zhou et al, 2004;Rajan et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%