2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucoadhesive properties of various pectins on gastrointestinal mucosa: An in vitro evaluation using texture analyzer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
116
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
116
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, pectin shows maximum mucoadhesion on the large intestinal tissue compared to other regions of the GIT, which represents an added advantage for colon targeting (Thirawong et al, 2007). It is noteworthy that the pressure applied to adhere MPs to the hydrated mucin discs is not relevant to the in vivo conditions but this test is helpful in screening the most promising formulation in terms of mucoadheisve strength.…”
Section: In Vitro Mucoadhesion Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, pectin shows maximum mucoadhesion on the large intestinal tissue compared to other regions of the GIT, which represents an added advantage for colon targeting (Thirawong et al, 2007). It is noteworthy that the pressure applied to adhere MPs to the hydrated mucin discs is not relevant to the in vivo conditions but this test is helpful in screening the most promising formulation in terms of mucoadheisve strength.…”
Section: In Vitro Mucoadhesion Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of mucoadhesion 60 involves wetting and swelling of polymer, interpenetration between the polymer chains and the mucosal membrane and formation of chemical bonds between the entangled chains and mucin (Palacio et al, 2012). There are several approaches used to assess the mucoadhesive performance of polymeric dosage forms including texture analyser (Thirawong et al, 2007;Ayensu et al, 2012), rheometry (Tamburic and Craig, 1997) and chemometrics (Boateng et 65 al., 2015). The texture analyser technique (TA) assesses the stickiness, the total work of adhesion (TWA) and the cohesiveness of the dosage forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stickiness is described as the maximum force (peak adhesive force -PAF)) required to separate the probe attached to the formulation from the mucosal substrate whereas, the total amount of work exerted in detaching the probe from the mucosal substrate is referred to as work of adhesion and is calculated from 70 the area under the force versus distance curve. Cohesiveness is defined as the intermolecular attraction between the mucosal substrate and formulation, and determined by the travel distance in mm on the force versus distance plot (Thirawong et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the interaction between a mucosal (moist) surface and mucoadhesive polymers is a result of physical entanglement and secondary interactive forces, mainly due to hydrogen bonding and van der Waals attraction forces which depend upon the chemical structure of the polymer 10 . Peppas and Buri proposed certain characteristics which are necessary for effective mucoadhesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%