2002
DOI: 10.1128/iai.70.4.2022-2028.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosal or Parenteral Administration of Microsphere-Associated Bacillus anthracis Protective Antigen Protects against Anthrax Infection in Mice

Abstract: Existing licensed anthrax vaccines are administered parenterally and require multiple doses to induce protective immunity. This requires trained personnel and is not the optimum route for stimulating a mucosal immune response. Microencapsulation of vaccine antigens offers a number of advantages over traditional vaccine formulations, including stability without refrigeration and the potential for utilizing less invasive routes of administration. Recombinant protective antigen (rPA), the dominant antigen for pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(19 reference statements)
4
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various formulations have been tested in preparing anthrax vaccines based upon rPA for its ability to elicit optimal immunological responses. Recent examples include Toll-like receptor ligands CpG ODN and Resiquimod R-848 [35,36], pluronic F127, a non-ionic, hydrophilic polyoxyethylenepolyoxypropylene block copolymer [37], additional vaccine antigens such as capsule [38] or EF [39,40], DNA vaccines [41], and mucosal vaccine strategies [42,43]. That antibodies have been recognized as important in protection is demonstrated by the number of immunotherapeutic reagents that have been recently suggested [44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Effect Of Formaldehyde On Serological Response and Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various formulations have been tested in preparing anthrax vaccines based upon rPA for its ability to elicit optimal immunological responses. Recent examples include Toll-like receptor ligands CpG ODN and Resiquimod R-848 [35,36], pluronic F127, a non-ionic, hydrophilic polyoxyethylenepolyoxypropylene block copolymer [37], additional vaccine antigens such as capsule [38] or EF [39,40], DNA vaccines [41], and mucosal vaccine strategies [42,43]. That antibodies have been recognized as important in protection is demonstrated by the number of immunotherapeutic reagents that have been recently suggested [44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Effect Of Formaldehyde On Serological Response and Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several candidate vaccines based on rPA have been described [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and have been shown to be highly protective against lethal aerosol or parenteral B. anthracis spore challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También ha resultado exitosa la utilización de una vacuna a base de esporos de la cepa ΔSterne pXO1-, pXO2-, con posibilidad de expresar AP e inducir una respuesta anti AP mediada por IgG e IgAs cuando se la aplica por vía oral a cobayos, siendo capaz de proteger animales vacunados cuando se desafían con 20 DL 50 de B. anthracis. Las ventaja de estas vacunas orales reside en la facilidad de aplicación de las mismas, teniendo en cuenta el plan básico de inmunización que consta, como mí-nimo, de 6 aplicaciones (Aloni-Gristein et al, 2005;Flick-Smith et al, 2002;Mikszta et al, 2005;Sloat et al, 2005).…”
Section: Vacunas Aplicadas Por La Vía De Las Mucosasunclassified