1999
DOI: 10.1080/00016489950180658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucosal Surface Area Determines the Middle Ear Pressure Response Following Establishment of Sniff-Induced Underpressures

Abstract: These results do not support a pressure-regulating role for the mastoid mucosa. Contrary to currently held beliefs, the model simulation suggests that small, not large mastoid volumes buffer ME pressure from rapid change due to trans-mucosal gas transfers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed equations show that this is true only true for ears derived from a population where the tympanum/MACS ratio of effective blood perfusion (related to surface area) per unit volume, M, is less than 1. Geometrical considerations show that the surface area per unit volume ratio of the MACS is much greater than that for the tympanum, and consequently, if M<1, blood perfusion per unit surface area must be much less for the MACS when compared to the tympanum [1,14,[37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The developed equations show that this is true only true for ears derived from a population where the tympanum/MACS ratio of effective blood perfusion (related to surface area) per unit volume, M, is less than 1. Geometrical considerations show that the surface area per unit volume ratio of the MACS is much greater than that for the tympanum, and consequently, if M<1, blood perfusion per unit surface area must be much less for the MACS when compared to the tympanum [1,14,[37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include active gas generation and ME pressure-buffering. While the physiological mechanism underlying MACS gas generation is not well developed [3,5,13] and experimental evidences supporting that possibility have alternative explanations [14], ME pressure-buffering is easily demonstrated. There, pressure-buffering can be decomposed into two effects, a magnitudelimiting effect on pressure change under conditions where ME cavity volume is changed (Boyle's Law) [15] and a rate-limiting effect on pressure change under conditions where the contained volume of ME gas is changed (General Gas Law) [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the above ratio and the initial partial pressure differences given in Table 2, the initial rate at which O 2 diffuses into the blood is calculated to be 4.3 times the rate at which N 2 diffuses into the ME. For CO 2 , the solubility times diffusivity product is ϳ35 times higher than that of N 2 (7,8,11,14,15,17). Taking into account the initial gradient, CO 2 is initially transported into the ME cavity at ϳ480 times the N 2 rate.…”
Section: Phase Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in [19], understanding the mechanism of the middle ear pressure regulation is important for both physiologists and practising clinicians; especially for the practising clinicians in their decisions on how to treat their patients. The surface area of the mucosa in the middle ear, especially the one covering the mastoid air cell system, is therefore a valuable parameter for physiological studies of gas exchanged between the air cells and the capillaries present in the mucosa lining the air cells [18,19,62].…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%