“…The application of the CMM (see, for example, [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]) to the study of SRA of realizations of random processes has a number of advantages (see [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ] and references therein) in comparison with the well-known Balakrishnan theorem (TB) [ 18 ] and many of its generalizations. Indeed, SRA based on CMM are distinguished by such positive qualities as: (1) Restoration of a sampled realization of a random process according to the CMM automatically provides a minimum of the root-mean-square error of restoration; (2) the restoring function, like the restoring error function in the general case, takes into account the main statistical characteristics of a random process: Probability density, covariance, and cumulant functions; spectrum (a process with a limited spectrum is a special case); (3) the considered algorithms are optimal for any number and location of samples (the variant of periodic samples is a special case); (4) general analytical expressions for the considered SRA cover stationary and non-stationary variants of stochastic processes; (5) sampled stochastic processes can be Gaussian and non-Gaussian, continuous and discontinuous, etc.…”