2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10781-013-9184-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mukulabhaṭṭa’s Defense of Lakṣaṇā: How We Use Words to Mean Something Else, But Not Everything Else

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47 I think that a disjunctive syllogism is not anumāna and is a truth of reason; for one can know it without depending on observation. Keating (2013) claims that arthāpatti, especially śrutārthāpatti, 'forms the basis of both semantic and pragmatic processes' involved in lakṣaṇā. 48 I shall argue that arthāpatti is not essential to lakṣaṇā.…”
Section: Linguistic Postulation (śRutārthāpatti) and Indication (Lakṣmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47 I think that a disjunctive syllogism is not anumāna and is a truth of reason; for one can know it without depending on observation. Keating (2013) claims that arthāpatti, especially śrutārthāpatti, 'forms the basis of both semantic and pragmatic processes' involved in lakṣaṇā. 48 I shall argue that arthāpatti is not essential to lakṣaṇā.…”
Section: Linguistic Postulation (śRutārthāpatti) and Indication (Lakṣmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recently published paper, Keating (2013) has claimed that postulation is something like abduction. He thinks that postulation plays an essential role in lakṣaṇā or indication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%