Mulberry therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Andrade, Janaina Freitas De; Silva, Valter; Melnik, Tamara

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011697.pub2

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The search strategy incorporated both Medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords for T2DM, guidelines, and adherence (Appendix 1) and was adapted from recent published reviews. [22][23][24] All MeSH subheading were included. No language restrictions were applied to optimise capture of guideline target achievement globally.…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Achievement of guideline targets for blood pressure, lipid, and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis

Khunti

Ceriello²,

Cos

et al. 2018

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

147

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We assessed global achievement of targets recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), and National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for type 2 diabetes. We searched Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for observational studies reporting target attainment (2006 to 2017 inclusive) for HbA1c, blood pressure, or lipids (low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], or triglycerides). Rates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Study quality and risk of small study of bias was assessed. From 2491 screened records, 24 studies were included reporting on 369,251 people from 20 countries. The pooled target achievement rates were; 42.8% (95% CI 38.1-47.5%) for glycaemic control, 29.0% (22.9-35.9%) for blood pressure, 49.2% (39.0-59.4%) for LDL-C, 58.2% (51.7-64.4%) for HDL-C, and 61.9% (55.2-68.2%) for triglyceride control. A higher proportion of people achieved HbA1c targets within Europe and North America than the rest of the world. A higher proportion of people achieved blood pressure targets in North America than Europe or the rest of the world. Meta regression showed no significant improvement in rates by year for any target. The achievement of evidence-based targets is markedly suboptimal globally and not improving.

show abstract

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%