2008
DOI: 10.1080/00207540600969758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-agent-based workload control for make-to-order manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early releases may incur earliness costs, shop congestions, higher work-in process (WIP), and possible interference with urgent jobs. On the contrary, late releases may incur tardiness costs due to missed due dates and greater lead times [40,41]. In addition, using job release times as variables seem to offer other benefits mainly because other variables depend on those times [41,42].…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early releases may incur earliness costs, shop congestions, higher work-in process (WIP), and possible interference with urgent jobs. On the contrary, late releases may incur tardiness costs due to missed due dates and greater lead times [40,41]. In addition, using job release times as variables seem to offer other benefits mainly because other variables depend on those times [41,42].…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that ORR systems developed for job shops are not those best suited for use in these new systems. In fact, as also noted by Weng et al (2008), we believe that the applicability and the effectiveness of production planning and control approaches depend on shop floor configuration. The aim of this paper is therefore to present an ORR system specifically designed for MTO and ETO companies (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job-or product-related performance measures observed in the literature to assess the effectiveness of WLC include delivery, proportion of successful quotations, quality, and cost (see, for example, Cigolini and Portioli-Staudacher 2002;Kingsman and Hendry 2002;Weng 2008;and Hendry, Huang, and Stevenson 2013). Quality and cost improvements have been indirectly attributed to the impact of WLC associated with the reduction of work-in-progress and overwork (Hendry, Huang, and Stevenson 2013); their specific measures are not detailed as a direct performance of WLC.…”
Section: Job/product Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%