2023
DOI: 10.1049/pel2.12452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐agent voltage balancing in modular motor drives with series‐connected power electronic converters

Abstract: Modular motor drives can be considered as multi‐agent systems, in which the agents can work together to reach a common goal. One agent in such a modular motor drive consists of only a subset of the machine phases and power electronic converter modules, and is equipped with a dedicated controller. When the dc‐links of the different agents are connected in series to a single voltage source, giving rise to a so‐called stacked polyphase bridges converter, the power electronic converter components can have low volt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, a completely decentralised multi‐agent voltage balancing algorithm is used for this purpose, which is based on the algorithm presented in Ref. [13]. This algorithm avoids the need for a central voltage sensor to measure the total dc‐bus voltage E dc , as this is an additional voltage sensor and a single point of failure.…”
Section: Multi‐agent Voltage Balancing Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this work, a completely decentralised multi‐agent voltage balancing algorithm is used for this purpose, which is based on the algorithm presented in Ref. [13]. This algorithm avoids the need for a central voltage sensor to measure the total dc‐bus voltage E dc , as this is an additional voltage sensor and a single point of failure.…”
Section: Multi‐agent Voltage Balancing Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each discrete time instant k (with the voltage balancer's update period T vb = 1/ f vb between subsequent time instants), all the agents are assumed to have exchanged their variables p x and vdc,x ${\overline{v}}_{\text{dc},x}$ with their two closest neighbours, and to update their variables as follows [13, 28, 29]: leftrightqxfalse(k+1false)left=ρqxfalse(kfalse)+knormalp[]vdc,x(k)+px(k)rightleft12truevdc,x1false(kfalse)+px1false(kfalse)rightleft12truevdc,x+1false(kfalse)+px+1false(kfalse), \begin{align*}\hfill {q}_{x}(k+1)& =\rho {q}_{x}(k)+{k}_{\mathrm{p}}\left\{\left[{\overline{v}}_{\text{dc},x}(k)+{p}_{x}(k)\right]\right.\hfill \\ \hfill & \quad -\frac{1}{2}\left[{\overline{v}}_{\text{dc},x-1}(k)+{p}_{x-1}(k)\right]\hfill \\ \hfill & \quad \left.-\frac{1}{2}\left[{\overline{v}}_{\text{dc},x+1}(k)+{p}_{x+1}(k)\right]\right\},\hfill \end{align*} leftrightpxfalse(k+1false)left=pxfalse(kfalse)+knormalitruevdc,xfalse(kfalse)rightleft12truevdc,x1<...…”
Section: Multi‐agent Voltage Balancing Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations