2006 3rd International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2006.4362299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Antenna Relay Nodes in OFDM Systems

Abstract: In this paper we study different ways of embedding multi-antenna relay nodes to OFDM systems. We compare the performance of half-duplex Amplify and Forward, Amplify and Forward within the Cyclic Prefix and Decode and Forward relays in combination with multi-stream MIMO communication. We show that the eigenvalue spread of the effective channel matrix is much higher for the Amplify and Forward relaying protocols compared to the Decode and Forward protocols. Thus, Decode and Forward relays offer better spatial mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transmit and receive antennas are assumed to be adequately separated so as to make the channel realizations statistically independent in the spatial domain. Comparisons are made with SA (suboptimal approach) in which the unitary matrices S and P in (13) and (21) are set equal to the identity matrix (see [11] - [14]). Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transmit and receive antennas are assumed to be adequately separated so as to make the channel realizations statistically independent in the spatial domain. Comparisons are made with SA (suboptimal approach) in which the unitary matrices S and P in (13) and (21) are set equal to the identity matrix (see [11] - [14]). Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ǫ k ] T . The above problem is formally equivalent to the one discussed in [11] meaning that the matrices U and F solving (P 2 ) have the same form of those computed in [11] and are given by (13) in the text. For notational convenience, we denote by P T (U, F) the transmit power required by the matrices (U, F) and call [E k (U, F)] n,n the corresponding MSE of the kth symbol over the nth subcarrier.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of a large number of subcarriers, some techniques, such as subcarrier grouping [15,16] and multi-antenna relays [17,18], where one relay can be designed properly to serve multiple subcarriers, can be utilized to considerably reduce the number of relays needed. The power allocation strategies are approached by maximizing the approximated channel capacity under aggregate power constraint (APC) and separate power constraint (SPC), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%