2016
DOI: 10.1364/ol.41.001869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-aperture foveated imaging

Abstract: Foveated imaging, such as that evolved by biological systems to provide high angular resolution with a reduced space-bandwidth product, also offers advantages for manmade task-specific imaging. Foveated imaging systems using exclusively optical distortion are complex, bulky, and high cost, however. We demonstrate foveated imaging using a planar array of identical cameras combined with a prism array and superresolution reconstruction of a mosaicked image with a foveal variation in angular resolution of 5.9:1 an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous strategies to achieve foveated sampling include: the use of non-uniform sensors (with variable photoreceptor density, mimicking the variable sampling rate of the retina) [1]; optical distortion for foveated lens design [2][3][4]; computational integration of independent imagers with dissimilar resolutions [5][6][7][8][9] and the use of a single sensor segmented into multiple channels with dissimilar magnifications [10]. The high cost of hardware and the added complexity of non-uniform sensors, or the optical complexity of foveal optics design, usually make these solutions unattractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous strategies to achieve foveated sampling include: the use of non-uniform sensors (with variable photoreceptor density, mimicking the variable sampling rate of the retina) [1]; optical distortion for foveated lens design [2][3][4]; computational integration of independent imagers with dissimilar resolutions [5][6][7][8][9] and the use of a single sensor segmented into multiple channels with dissimilar magnifications [10]. The high cost of hardware and the added complexity of non-uniform sensors, or the optical complexity of foveal optics design, usually make these solutions unattractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different but related approach is to form a composite image from a mosaic of several images with dissimilarly optical distortions (e.g. using prisms) [9]. Computational integration of independent imaging systems is a simple, robust and powerful approach that enables arbitrary foveal ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, two or more cameras can be used and post-processed to generate a unified foveated image [9,10]. Though custom imaging sensors have been proposed [9,11], this approach also exploits off-the-shelf cameras [10]. We follow the latter approach, in agreement with Carles et al [6]'s argument that the low-cost, high-performance computing has made post-processing an appealing solution compared to the complexity of custom sensor and optics design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In order to obtain both large FOV and high resolution, the Aware-2 imaging system [ 14 ] utilizes a multi-scale lens and a micro-camera array achieving 120° and 38 μrad instantaneous FOV of a single pixel, but the system is bulky, and it is time-consuming due to the required calibration of 98 micro-cameras and the sub-image mosaic with iterative methods. In addition, large volume redundant data results in low efficiency for object detection or target tracking [ 15 ]. In recent years, the development of a flexible printed circuit board and liquid lens has motivated some remarkable CACE designs [ 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some researchers have been studying the combination of a compound eye and foveated vision to improve the performance of imaging systems. Guillem Carles et al [ 15 ] developed a multichannel imaging system which combines prism array and PACE to obtain FOV extension and foveated imaging. However, in order to achieve a high foveal ratio in the fovea, the FOV of each ommatidium overlaps in the fovea region, and the system only achieves two-fold FOV extension with a 5 × 5 camera array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%