2021 15th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) 2021
DOI: 10.23919/eucap51087.2021.9410968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-band Measurements in Indoor Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table (2) displays path loss parameters from previous studies for indoor propagation channel modeling at mmWave and sub-THz frequency bands. In order to validate the presented models, we use the different parameters that have been published in previous work such as [11,12,13]. So that figs ( 2) and (3) show the CI, FI and ABG path loss models LOS and NLOS at frequencies 28GHz and 73GHz respectively and fig (4) shows CI, FI and ABG path loss models LOS at frequencies 300GHz.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table (2) displays path loss parameters from previous studies for indoor propagation channel modeling at mmWave and sub-THz frequency bands. In order to validate the presented models, we use the different parameters that have been published in previous work such as [11,12,13]. So that figs ( 2) and (3) show the CI, FI and ABG path loss models LOS and NLOS at frequencies 28GHz and 73GHz respectively and fig (4) shows CI, FI and ABG path loss models LOS at frequencies 300GHz.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following, calculate path loss using various propagation models, SINR, and aggregated throughput. In this paper, we will utilize three path-loss models: The primary is the single-frequency close-in (CI) free space, the single-frequency floating-intercept (FI), and the alphabeta-gamma (ABG) [11]. The first is the single-frequency close-in (CI) free space reference distance model, which is defined as in equation (1).…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional procedure for calibration is to disconnect the antennas from the channel sounder and to calibrate the RF front ends between the antenna ports and the antennas separately. 1 To calibrate the front ends, a full two-port calibration is prescribed for vector network analyzer (VNA)-based systems [8], [13], [16]; other correlation-based systems employ a back-to-back method [9]- [12], [15]. These calibration procedures have been well established for years and so are relatively standard and straightforward, yet some do not calibrate the front ends at all [4]- [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And to enable precision antenna de-embedding, it is spherical angle (AZ and EL) that must be estimated, yet only a few papers do [9]- [11], [16] -the others either estimate AZ only [12], [13] or no angle at all. Finally, although an antenna may be classified as omnidirectional [15], antenna gain is never truly omnidirectional in both planes and so its effects on estimated path gain cannot be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation