2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/isbi45749.2020.9098553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Branch Deformable Convolutional Neural Network with Label Distribution Learning for Fetal Brain Age Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observe consistently better results for all models when using the brain rather than the trunk ROI, with best figures 0.683 (0.950) provided again by DenseNet-201. These results compare favourably with those reported by Liao et al (2020), 0.751 (0.947), and Shi et al (2020), 0.767 (0.920), and, in terms of MAE, they seem to do so by a substantial margin. Further to this, with the exception of R 2 for poorly performing MobileNet-v2 and GoogleLeNet, additional improvements are consistently observed for all models when combining volumetric brain and trunk information, a unique feature of the proposed technique, with MAE (R 2 ) 0.618 (0.958) for DenseNet-201.…”
Section: Clinical Application: Ga Predictionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also observe consistently better results for all models when using the brain rather than the trunk ROI, with best figures 0.683 (0.950) provided again by DenseNet-201. These results compare favourably with those reported by Liao et al (2020), 0.751 (0.947), and Shi et al (2020), 0.767 (0.920), and, in terms of MAE, they seem to do so by a substantial margin. Further to this, with the exception of R 2 for poorly performing MobileNet-v2 and GoogleLeNet, additional improvements are consistently observed for all models when combining volumetric brain and trunk information, a unique feature of the proposed technique, with MAE (R 2 ) 0.618 (0.958) for DenseNet-201.…”
Section: Clinical Application: Ga Predictionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We have shown that deep feature extraction using pre-trained models combined with correlation constrained linear regression provides accurate results for this task. Our results look superior to existing methods (Liao et al, 2020;Shi et al, 2020), particularly when complementing brain features with trunk information, but there are differences in the cohorts considered. Most notably, existing methods use larger cohorts including single-sequence data from 289 subjects (Liao et al, 2020) and multi-sequence data from 764 subjects (Shi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To ensure comparisons are performed using the same FOV, we assess the performance of RGDSVR and DSVR for GA estimation using a trunk ROI corresponding to the FOV used as the target reconstruction volume in the experiments in [11]. As existing methods for fetal GA estimation from MRI [14], [39], [40] are based on brain data, we also test the GA estimation performance using a brain ROI from our reconstructions. In all cases we use the GA estimation method described in § II-H with 3D space spanned by slices from N r = 200 random volume reorientations.…”
Section: E Clinically-oriented Application: Ga Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%