2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-018-0773-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Camera Active-Vision for Markerless Shape Recovery of Unknown Deforming Objects

Abstract: This thesis proposes a multi-camera active-vision reconfiguration system which selects camera poses online to improve the shape recovery of a priori unknown, markerless, deforming objects in dynamic environments. The objectives of shape recovery are defined as surface sampling accuracy, and shape completeness. The completeness objective is generalized for both solid and surface-based objects as the maximization of surface visibility. Thus, improving the recovered shape of target objects is shown to be analogou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum number of cameras can be obtained with additional formulation from the setup described in Proposition 1. Approaches dealing with coverage problems often include a visibility map or visibility function, which relates the point of view of a sensor with the parts of the object it is covering at certain time instant [15], [28]. From Proposition 1 we can also consider a visibility matrix V S×C = [V ji ] that indicates which segments are detected by each camera, i.e.…”
Section: Limits Of the Number Of Camerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum number of cameras can be obtained with additional formulation from the setup described in Proposition 1. Approaches dealing with coverage problems often include a visibility map or visibility function, which relates the point of view of a sensor with the parts of the object it is covering at certain time instant [15], [28]. From Proposition 1 we can also consider a visibility matrix V S×C = [V ji ] that indicates which segments are detected by each camera, i.e.…”
Section: Limits Of the Number Of Camerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the active perception field [25], [26], works in this domain are dynamic in general. Multi-camera centralized networks, where the position and orientation of each sensor are optimized, are considered in studies of this field for shape recovery of moving deformable objects [27], [28]. Compared to our approach, these works do not minimize the number of cameras that are necessary to recover the shape of the object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for the parts in machining process, it needs to deploy the cameras for monitoring the whole machining process. This kind of problem can be regarded as visual coverage for deformable object, which has been discussed in [13]- [15] via dynamical deploying the cameras according to the deformation process. Due to the field of view for the camera is always wide, the static deployment of cameras is sufficient for visual coverage on deformable object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Works in the active perception field are usually dynamic in the sense that in order to get more information about the environment, whose properties may change over time, the sensors must reconfigure their position and/or orientation depending on the requirements of the perception task. The multi-camera centralized networks in [15] and [16] are optimized in position and orientation so that they are able to recover the shape of a moving and deformable target object, but they do not consider robust perception aspects such as occlusion avoidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%